From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-371640-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2846 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2014 08:00:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2809 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2014 08:00:03 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-qg0-f44.google.com
Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f44.google.com) (209.85.192.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:00:02 +0000
Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j107so4443886qga.17        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=wpZvzmMtJIeMs830GJIM2GBZw/ERMqNJkpRmzbyJ+7c=;        b=JzeuO3a2aLVLhuWVKF28kaELvUaiKLvLY2j9sVAkweeSHbrYtAr5iNOCa7cJSXf4qr         warHGqT95LpzNL6VaTbfEVBtDRWWBrbqr9VUW4fsc6Ivo89KfGWQhML7+tO/piYD9mb2         VGSM3m8SBXInj6pLY5CNP+U7yfs934FVFma5+v4dd+FKPSQEytSFxip/k5Yd5l3z/TOL         trhzJv+2NRnOi5Oo70/dZmNZvUQbjoXn5lk7OhsbY2WsOK4t5eAGetKbjV80ye1dQL/7         D+qjlShM4eMJtYfpGENtq15vFgv+jAzyBxR4A/SUEmDFzNWvZ40NE/v6AnooB2OeIUzH         pkhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQle67ygl+xLWw6kSp/xfUBs6ldGCy+sx6iXUChGLx/3GOq91NPR2pZxZ7MeWHEZpSk+F4Ua
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.115.3 with SMTP id g3mr70191642qaq.9.1404287999886; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.93.42 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFqB+PzfamtfspZa_xKS9ht9XtgGC4JBM7kp5v2jgCTjBL01vQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53A839EB.3090603@arm.com>	<CAFqB+PzfamtfspZa_xKS9ht9XtgGC4JBM7kp5v2jgCTjBL01vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKdteOYZaEe19v8vGD8oG8JpB91t5w597o95m1ASPrGJ5EUyVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AArch64] Implement some vca*_f[32,64] intrinsics
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2

Hi,

It seems some of the scan-assembler directives fail:
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/212196/aarch64-none-elf/diff-gcc-rh50-aarch64-none-elf-default-default-default.txt

Christophe.


On 1 July 2014 14:13, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 June 2014 15:30, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch implements some absolute compare intrinsics in arm_neon.h.
>>
>> Execution tests are added.
>> Tested aarch64-none-elf, aarch64_be-none-elf, bootstrapped on aarch64 linux
>
>
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-save-temps -O3" } */
> +
> +#include "arm_neon.h"
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
>
> Drop the dependence on stdio.h please.
>
> +            fprintf (stderr, "Expected: %ld, got %ld\n", expected, actual);
>
> No need to print the expected value, abort( i alone is fine.  Dropping
> the printf will make the #include above go away.
>
> Ok with those changes.
>
> /Marcus