From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-411814-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 103563 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2015 13:44:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103422 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2015 13:44:47 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f169.google.com
Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:44:45 +0000
Received: by qkgb2 with SMTP id b2so3193680qkg.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;        bh=RHEsm9byVjfCZ78KJUmNkooljwoMh4/GIKtths/XGQc=;        b=Wyf1tcGAnVA4tnFNJ+mqjzEmR1mJ48ew06iST25XU/Z+KmrR6wMVG7aI432Ep3AX/G         UTJfS8jzCCaAVGTwnSb1hjCj5cZeGhG1+bsNIxSERNZ7te6ZMzydKNJlVTlQB0Sk7n6X         Mj2qzn91N1APxpRU5CqPbkI27eZvzNUYnyUpyulQN6L+xq4DdqugN7Qb6/LHDc+t2ROF         9iZHWuTWZPB9ei3Jh2bOOIiokVsKL7cZeQ8TuIRMgORcUrMDRfe4MagWqPPY3+kFWvkJ         wpRrnrhMsJ+ql+prYdlwcULlTLE6JEowpP3RsY+OFXoJS0ZP3DTKON7RvzjQSEL3GgyM         qesQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJFa5EGZQMqj1xkBAUbcSxRNvIU+t+/3lP3S3ebiN/mpQb0zavkBrUAPTPzas2o4Dbmn1l
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.79.214 with SMTP id d205mr17590534qkb.22.1446039883147; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.29.136 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3oG_N-KXcAEYcmKkrogngrLe=4j3ag5Fir_de6uKda3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151002135921.GE26618@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>	<mvmbnbrmcrw.fsf@hawking.suse.de>	<CAMbmDYb9MhPrrs+L50XAQA8N_aYvd+TACEQ-BFbRtduPjH7V+g@mail.gmail.com>	<mvm7fmfmbnv.fsf@hawking.suse.de>	<20151022162105.GB23452@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>	<CAFiYyc3aRo-=kW-qD3xCaCkTVkJ=Zbaq-pZhvAd7XJo=QSpsxg@mail.gmail.com>	<20151023111240.GC23452@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>	<CAFiYyc3oG_N-KXcAEYcmKkrogngrLe=4j3ag5Fir_de6uKda3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKdteOY_bHt4cOr-b2UyYpt3n-XvdYz2kW1LdwJv_kR1D0j7zA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Boolean Vector, patch 1/5] Introduce boolean vector to be used as a vector comparison type
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg03035.txt.bz2

Hi,

Since r229128, I see:
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-1.c   -O0  execution test
on arm targets, such as arm-none-eabi.

Christophe.