From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103860 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2019 09:10:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 103852 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2019 09:10:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:498 X-HELO: mail-lj1-f178.google.com Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (HELO mail-lj1-f178.google.com) (209.85.208.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:10:12 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id k18so15087598ljc.11 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 02:10:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9i5kpZvXftzKuQt7MsMY+LjydtFfAT7kYX9c17hFZ0w=; b=fEKbG3jw4M/9yLk5Vc6C5bz22U1zsxOWO5nJWccYyrtbOe7quYAbnZBm+9CXVmDoQF BlWmeGO5SGwoW0Udi5bsEFYLvu/bEsSmIz3xV4QDi8/q9th4aTmZTkSpQ0tb7w3cF/kr Zfl2WjeUTnimAIdfUsCUMvBMjXmYHyS2hrnMHk1tpMPkmgZRmyS6FaphnWKwAFNNIlsg jioAOxEAn4b+Zn3dOAyM10WWRJuCW1S43n+/AFbK9HHvwl5/uowKt95ZIs3aFosSvGsh iKnpU/gjPHGAJTiMS+ML3JZHkggsRpxkUOV/Oxq19Nx4Firp8A+YYXEQqJEE6AzBtK9/ H37Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Christophe Lyon Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][armeb] PR 91060 gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c fails since r272843 To: Christophe Lyon , gcc Patches , Richard Biener , Richard Sandiford Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 11:04, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Christophe Lyon writes: > > Hi, > > > > This patch fixes PR 91060 where the lane ordering was no longer the > > right one (GCC's vs architecture's). > > Sorry, we clashed :-) > > I'd prefer to go with the version I attached to bugzilla just now. Yes just saw that, thanks! > > Thanks, > Richard