On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:06, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> >>> 2020-08-05  Marc Glisse  <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
> >>>
> >>>         PR tree-optimization/95906
> >>>         PR target/70314
> >>>         * match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
> >>>         (v ? w : 0) ? a : b, c1 ? c2 ? a : b : b): New transformations.
> >>>         (op (c ? a : b)): Update to match the new transformations.
> >>>
> >>>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/andnot-2.c: New file.
> >>>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr95906.c: Likewise.
> >>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr70314.c: Likewise.
> >>>
> >
> > I think this patch is causing several ICEs on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> > --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu neon-fp16:
> >  Executed from: gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp
> >    gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (internal
> > compiler error)
> >    gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3 -g  (internal compiler error)
> >  Executed from: gcc.dg/dg.exp
> >    gcc.dg/pr87746.c (internal compiler error)
> >  Executed from: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp
> >    gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-cd.c (internal compiler error)
>
> I tried a cross from x86_64-linux with current master
>
> .../configure --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-system-zlib --disable-nls --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon-fp16
> make
>
> it stops at some point with an error, but I have xgcc and cc1 in
> build/gcc.
>
> I copied 2 of the testcases and compiled
>
> ./xgcc pr87746.c -Ofast -S -B.
> ./xgcc -O3 -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details-blocks-details ifc-cd.c -S -B.
>
> without getting any ICE.

Sorry for the delay, I had to reproduce the problem manually.
>
> Is there a machine on the compile farm where this is easy to reproduce?
I don't think there is any arm machine in the compile farm.

> Or could you attach the .optimized dump that corresponds to the
> backtrace below? It looks like we end up with a comparison with an
> unexpected return type.
>

I've compiled pr87746.c with -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details-blocks-details,
here is the log.
Is that what you need?

Thanks,

Christophe

> >  Executed from: gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp
> >    gcc.dg/vect/pr59591-1.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/pr59591-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/pr86927.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/pr86927.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/slp-cond-5.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/slp-cond-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-24.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-24.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-6.c (internal compiler error)
> >    gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal
> > compiler error)
> >
> > Backtrace for gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c   -O3
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer
> > -finline-functions
> > during RTL pass: expand
> > /gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20160205-1.c:2:5: internal
> > compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12259
> > 0x8feb26 do_store_flag
> >        /gcc/expr.c:12259
> > 0x900201 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:9617
> > 0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:10159
> > 0x91174e expand_expr
> >        /gcc/expr.h:282
> > 0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> > rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:8065
> > 0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:9950
> > 0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:10159
> > 0x91174e expand_expr
> >        /gcc/expr.h:282
> > 0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> > rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:8065
> > 0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:9950
> > 0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:10159
> > 0x91174e expand_expr
> >        /gcc/expr.h:282
> > 0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> > rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:8065
> > 0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:9950
> > 0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:10159
> > 0x91174e expand_expr
> >        /gcc/expr.h:282
> > 0x91174e expand_operands(tree_node*, tree_node*, rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> > rtx_def**, expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:8065
> > 0x8ff543 expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:9950
> > 0x908cd0 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> > expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
> >        /gcc/expr.c:10159
> > 0x91174e expand_expr
> >        /gcc/expr.h:282
> >
> > Christophe
>
> --
> Marc Glisse