From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125129 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2018 09:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125004 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2018 09:22:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-Received:Thu, H*f:CAAgBjM, H*f:sk:FW0qK83, H*f:sk:qne2aBG X-HELO: mail-ua0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-ua0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ua0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:22:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ua0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x16so1204248uaj.11 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:22:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6tSTdG8b9cHuGQjxxr5vSwBMHmyq1du3zrmz+KBfZaQ=; b=C9Fx5Wc5AqHC1ilSqXG2AckVlTeISSFkQO5Okr89vs9xgcWQAZqUusl6c8H0Xuv/fE 0Jw0S65mgHBzl+z0DPZht4lBuWhakyyoqA2KD2k1p8XA9ojsQxSlwoAbovIiemDwxjKB iJ2wWve9akJJ/buBOrv4ZmRP0TxRuw2yxFm9oegsDElkU2J6vPOxCFKKe6kn9ikBTmsL Ou9t/NCsgBaIBXjC2fSH7nNnOMNAIumI6/pvI+O/Xv9p9I+5u7imPj+i7fQLnFmoLBVf Ot+fg23UMfTbB9RRHkwjQJkPHZBGvZhHUe1tdEnJbmbJF6GAKGMfFonzpO0nmaKG6f0m rKkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyte/0Ryd2LNhEISsKJYP4ao5AgU/tC6VfYo+0nzMA2szlfO7Z5hH xD3zH7m7KapAR3IJVtd+XFDChnIQJSPzhOYVDNCkVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotlQ8Dl3KRGpkWSNxnk3U1rUJU/UbNG+93Bv8DK2spbgqQqlBblzNu0hvEPB1LDRuUcRiObSpmQIp2V1YpFmiQ= X-Received: by 10.176.25.67 with SMTP id u3mr16651139uag.44.1515662560855; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:22:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.150.150 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:22:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Christophe Lyon Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: PR81703 and Martin's fix for PR83501 To: Prathamesh Kulkarni Cc: gcc Patches , Martin Sebor Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00881.txt.bz2 Hi On 10 January 2018 at 19:42, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > I have attached patch for PR81703 rebased on Martin's fix for PR83501 > posted here since both had considerable overlaps: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00180.html > > The patch passes bootstrap+test on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > and cross-tested on aarch64-*-*. > Currently it fails to pass validation on arm targets because of PR83775. > I don't think the new failure is because of PR83775 (which is an ICE when calling cc1 directly without -march). The failure we have on arm is: FAIL: gcc.dg/strlenopt-39.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "(abort|strlen) \\(\\)" but just before that, we have: PASS: gcc.dg/strlenopt-39.c (test for excess errors) so the compilation did not ICE Christophe > Does it look OK? > > Thanks, > Prathamesh