From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [Patch, ARM, testsuite] Add -mfloat-abi=hard to arm_neon_ok
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdteOZfHk+PezRFs4XHNh6Dgv1FjR2Q92FDXOr2+5XgMpGw-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2698 bytes --]
Hi,
I have recently updated the dejagnu version I use for
cross-testing arm and aarch64 toolchains to 1.6+. One of the side
effects was mentioned by Jonathan in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01267.html. Since I
use multilibs to test many configurations, I noticed several
changes in the results I get.
In particular, on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with -march=armv5t,
all the tests that require arm_neon_ok fail to compile because
they now use -march=armv5t -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
-march=armv7-a, which leads to a failure to include
gnu/stubs-soft.h (not present since the target is
'hf'). Previously, -march=armv5t was appended, making the tests
unsupported because -mfpu=neon conflicts with -march=armv5t. Now,
arm_neon_ok succeeds because it only checks if some preprocessor
defines are present.
This patch fixes that by including arm_neon.h in arm_neon_ok, such
that it fails for unsupported cases. However, since most of these
tests should pass instead of becoming unsupported, I have added flag
combinations with -mfloat-abi=hard.
However, this is not sufficient to make the
gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837* tests pass: they do not require
arm_neon_ok, and when I tried to add it, they still failed
because these lto tests do not support dg-add-options. My
proposal is to add a new
check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi function which
tries to use neon without trying to change the -mfloat-abi
setting (that is, the same as arm_neon_ok, with only ""
and "-mfpu=neon" in the list of flags) . This makes these two lto
tests unsupported for non-hf targets (again because
gnu/stubs-soft.h is not present).
To make them pass on "hf" targets:
- I added -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options in pr65837-attr_0.c,
because the fpu attributes in arm_neon.h only work if
-mfpu=neon is enabled
- I removed dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} from pr65837_0.c,
-mfpu=neon is needed for the test to compile with toolchains
where the default fpu is not neon (eg vfpv3-d16-fp16)
On arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfp
and multilib test flag=-march=armv5t, this patch brings:
- 2 UNRESOLVED -> FAIL (gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c)
- 14 UNRESOLVED -> XPASS (in gcc.dg/vect/)
- 2765 new PASS
- 3639 FAIL -> PASS
- 1826 UNRESOLVED -> PASS
- 102 UNRESOLVED -> XFAIL
as visible in the red cell at
http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/248552-gnu-stubs9.patch/report-build-info.html
(the build-failed line can be ignored, it was caused by a server
problem)
Sorry, the explanation is almost longer than the patch :-)
Is it OK for trunk?
(Just realizing that I forgot to document the new functions :( )
Thanks,
Christophe
[-- Attachment #2: gnu-stubs9.chlog.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]
2017-06-02 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache): Add flags with
-mfloat-abi=hard. Include arm_neon.h.
(check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache): New.
(check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi): New.
* gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c: Require
arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Add -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options.
* gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c: Require
arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Remove dg-suppress-ld-options.
[-- Attachment #3: gnu-stubs9.patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3193 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
index ebc5f44..f00480b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
/* { dg-lto-do run } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */
-/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto}} } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */
+/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */
#include "arm_neon.h"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
index 6b2def9..5d7cea7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* { dg-lto-do run } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */
/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */
-/* { dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} } */
#include "arm_neon.h"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index ded6383..720b10b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -3434,8 +3434,9 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache { } {
global et_arm_neon_flags
set et_arm_neon_flags ""
if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
- foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a"} {
+ foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a" "-mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a"} {
if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok object {
+ #include <arm_neon.h>
int dummy;
#ifndef __ARM_NEON__
#error not NEON
@@ -3460,6 +3461,38 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok { } {
check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache]
}
+# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=neon without any
+# -mfloat-abi= option. Useful in tests where add_options is not
+# supported (such as lto tests).
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache { } {
+ if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
+ foreach flags {"" "-mfpu=neon"} {
+ if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi object {
+ #include <arm_neon.h>
+ int dummy;
+ #ifndef __ARM_NEON__
+ #error not NEON
+ #endif
+ /* Avoid the case where a test adds -mfpu=neon, but the toolchain is
+ configured for -mcpu=arm926ej-s, for example. */
+ #if __ARM_ARCH < 7 || __ARM_ARCH_PROFILE == 'M'
+ #error Architecture does not support NEON.
+ #endif
+ } "$flags"] } {
+ return 1
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0
+}
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi { } {
+ return [check_cached_effective_target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi \
+ check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache]
+}
+
proc check_effective_target_arm_crc_ok_nocache { } {
global et_arm_crc_flags
set et_arm_crc_flags "-march=armv8-a+crc"
next reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 14:19 Christophe Lyon [this message]
2017-06-07 9:13 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-16 15:39 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-26 7:34 ` Christophe Lyon
2017-06-26 9:13 ` Kyrill Tkachov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKdteOZfHk+PezRFs4XHNh6Dgv1FjR2Q92FDXOr2+5XgMpGw-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).