From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24022 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2017 06:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6069 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2017 06:09:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-qk0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:09:27 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p68so15367413qke.1 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:09:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NLDhCxfNj/EhOdcCshkkMGMAB2o3hU05xVnyu3OG6s8=; b=jjzJY3sQVnL6GhWpC2aPQvDhs6f80KozW/o+Lab3sk0xFR+c0/kleSYTpGbb0M0KxJ JftfKw3a/aB5Zih1woaMkETvr/lIUvhFizmcnHh78i4kROZNvkM+71/ZDvC2KAfQfIZW HLMNOuKsEuhZ6RTxeWabnhB+MrQTGodnb7en/BXmDFHNlWT0AX+lGIe7+yxFAKgwtia8 tWBt1/7O0rGFd44fLLM+WorXBqOWqbGZVPFc4knMm0cpT0OpiLVqD+anVjACma9pJebn A27CGmen95KCVAb7AFA/D4egGibHTDz5UGQ/eSk/cGkZCinLRWL/xI9XZ7S0Dw6UAhgH hB6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6v1boAbGIrQGwHUP1/SRwkalCWLn9Ufe5lKtUmmMNijHk94JNWz+TT+jAoux5cBlKiGVIEly/GijG2adAf X-Received: by 10.55.191.6 with SMTP id p6mr15528776qkf.250.1491977367384; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:09:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.104.76 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:09:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <930934bd-0341-6607-3d7e-96c34cebbabc@redhat.com> From: Christophe Lyon Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: One more path to fix PR70478 To: Vladimir Makarov Cc: gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00565.txt.bz2 On 11 April 2017 at 21:43, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > > On 04/11/2017 03:30 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> On 10 April 2017 at 17:05, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >>> >>> This is the second try to fix >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70478 >>> >>> The first try patch triggered a latent bug and broke one Fortran >>> testcase >>> on x86-64. >>> >>> The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and tested on >>> x86-64, >>> ppc64, and aarch64. >>> >>> Committed as rev. 246808. >>> >>> >> This patch causes regression on arm*hf configurations: >> Executed from: gcc.target/arm/arm.exp >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> ldrh\\tr[0-9]+ 2 >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> strh\\tr[0-9]+ 2 >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> vld1\\.16\\t{d[0-9]+\\[[0-9]+\\]}, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 2 >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> vmov\\.f16\\tr[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 4 >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> vmov\\.f16\\ts[0-9]+, r[0-9]+ 4 >> gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c scan-assembler-times >> vst1\\.16\\t{d[0-9]+\\[[0-9]+\\]}, \\[r[0-9]+\\] 2 >> >> > I've committed a patch which is supposed to fix the regression. > I confirm it's now OK. Thanks for the prompt fix! Christophe