public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
		Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
	"libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
		gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): PATCH to implement C++17 over-aligned new
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdteOa7UOh-hwcNaHsgoKRAgjx8QPrDNfvi2mOXmr_oxakf+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yddy42tzf84.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On 15 September 2016 at 11:26, Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
>>> I confirm no change on arm* either.
>>> On aarch64, gen-attrs-[25]1.C, and devirt-33 now work.
>>> name-clash11.C still fails on both targets
>>
>> Ah, I needed to remove the limit on field alignment as well.  This
>> seems to fix things.
>
> The failures are gone on Solaris/SPARC (sparc-sun-solaris2.12) now, with
> one exception (when run as C test):
>
> 32-bit:
>
> FAIL: c-c++-common/pr52181.c  -Wc++-compat   (test for bogus messages, line 11)
> FAIL: c-c++-common/pr52181.c  -Wc++-compat  (test for excess errors)
>

Hi Jason,

Same on arm* if that's easier for you.

Christophe


> This is new with you last patch.
>
> Excess errors:
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52181.c:6:1: warning: requested alignment 16 is larger than 8 [-Wattributes]
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52181.c:8:1: warning: requested alignment 16 is larger than 8 [-Wattributes]
>
>         Rainer
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-15 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-08  7:10 Jason Merrill
2016-09-08  8:32 ` Marc Glisse
2016-09-08 11:18   ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-09 21:40     ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-10  7:03       ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-10 10:14         ` Marc Glisse
2016-09-10 10:35           ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-11  9:14         ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-11  9:55           ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-11  9:56             ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-11 10:20             ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-11 12:09               ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-13 13:04         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-09-10 10:14       ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-11  7:09       ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-12 21:13         ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-13  8:41           ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-13 12:37           ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-13 12:54             ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-13 13:18               ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-13 13:21                 ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-14 12:13                   ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-14 16:11                     ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-14 16:37                       ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-15 10:00                         ` Rainer Orth
2016-09-15 12:23                           ` Christophe Lyon [this message]
2016-09-15 20:09                             ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-16  7:12                               ` Rainer Orth
2016-09-16  8:15                                 ` Christophe Lyon
2016-09-16  9:14                                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-16  9:51                                   ` Marc Glisse
2016-09-16 11:12                                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-16 13:13                                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-16 13:17                                         ` Rainer Orth
2016-09-16 18:19                                         ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-12 14:15       ` Rainer Orth
2016-09-12 16:19         ` Jonathan Wakely
2016-09-12 18:57           ` Jason Merrill
2016-09-14 12:11           ` Rainer Orth
2016-09-08 11:00 ` Jonathan Wakely
2017-11-24 14:26 ` Marc Glisse
2017-11-29 21:23   ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKdteOa7UOh-hwcNaHsgoKRAgjx8QPrDNfvi2mOXmr_oxakf+A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).