From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119453 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2016 12:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119429 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2016 12:12:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*ro, HTo:D*uni-bielefeld.de X-HELO: mail-qk0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f177.google.com) (209.85.220.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:12:03 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w204so45249987qka.0 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IYd6dSHrcuIa/oxsEVFCqrlH9To0oLH4FJyWGaFH2mM=; b=AwBu43mL/NEjpUmd18zVxY5kTNjuBSAQuMMe7EIOCOGgypWM7J8wJydAhctjAr547r vgfmFnwBL+5Df0Im3sw25gzgvmITQ6ckqQ6Vg9oMr8kwOZssSlJ8lT3yZCpLGILx6WkE VIKt7vvCO4C1LmmodDdt1zooG+q5BFjcOR2LmlQdDEI7Q2cRqFGBiPKtBnIaoco4tWsC IHN9YpN55l4yEGdGeQ6IkCqOggrdj/RoVv8LGXwpZ0WcC4q7NAdgpp8nQ2r6ijVwGSsj yu0DMicF6pcbPnTcioZClwRDpMUYqoekAOqkU+XrdK4vJMkRTP3i8xnhNtfPLbyhWTnJ oxOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPGC3D9wjT4j4itjh3OnEI8/tNeRLQRTvDYWkFk127zV0mOI5xjr9r4BtyNicEZJUkxtNcB6//yL47Ay2wA X-Received: by 10.55.103.210 with SMTP id b201mr8695414qkc.15.1473941521436; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:12:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.21.102 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160908110641.GB23306@redhat.com> <87oa3vwrkf.fsf@linux-m68k.org> From: Christophe Lyon Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): PATCH to implement C++17 over-aligned new To: Rainer Orth Cc: Jason Merrill , Andreas Schwab , Jonathan Wakely , "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00934.txt.bz2 On 15 September 2016 at 11:26, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Jason, > >>> I confirm no change on arm* either. >>> On aarch64, gen-attrs-[25]1.C, and devirt-33 now work. >>> name-clash11.C still fails on both targets >> >> Ah, I needed to remove the limit on field alignment as well. This >> seems to fix things. > > The failures are gone on Solaris/SPARC (sparc-sun-solaris2.12) now, with > one exception (when run as C test): > > 32-bit: > > FAIL: c-c++-common/pr52181.c -Wc++-compat (test for bogus messages, line 11) > FAIL: c-c++-common/pr52181.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) > Hi Jason, Same on arm* if that's easier for you. Christophe > This is new with you last patch. > > Excess errors: > /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52181.c:6:1: warning: requested alignment 16 is larger than 8 [-Wattributes] > /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr52181.c:8:1: warning: requested alignment 16 is larger than 8 [-Wattributes] > > Rainer > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University