From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdteOaE=-T-nY3vYDdS9SpP7ZoExXS5kUeOiHYx36GdoxKC3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f249de4a-5ed4-43df-125f-320c28a9a207@redhat.com>
On 22 June 2017 at 19:21, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> This time with the test. Just #includes 20031023-1.c with a suitable dg
> directive to ensure we compile with -fstack-check.
>
> I won't be surprised if other targets fail this test. It's a really big
> stack frame :-)
>
> Anyways, committed to the trunk.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
> index 0a3426eef3e..03a824f6b3f 100644
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> +2017-06-22 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
> +
> + * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_emit_probe_stack_range): Handle
> + frame sizes that do not satisfy aarch64_uimm12_shift.
> +
> 2017-06-22 Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
>
> * profile-count.h (apply_probability,
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index 3364a02e89c..95592f9fa17 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> @@ -2766,11 +2766,19 @@ aarch64_emit_probe_stack_range (HOST_WIDE_INT first, HOST_WIDE_INT size)
> plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, -first));
>
> /* LAST_ADDR = SP + FIRST + ROUNDED_SIZE. */
> - emit_set_insn (reg2,
> - plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
> - -(first + rounded_size)));
> -
> -
> + HOST_WIDE_INT adjustment = - (first + rounded_size);
> + if (! aarch64_uimm12_shift (adjustment))
> + {
> + aarch64_internal_mov_immediate (reg2, GEN_INT (adjustment),
> + true, Pmode);
> + emit_set_insn (reg2, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, reg2));
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + emit_set_insn (reg2,
> + plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, adjustment));
> + }
> +
> /* Step 3: the loop
>
> do
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> index 641e4124e37..e162386fb68 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +2017-06-22 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
> +
> + * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: New test.
> +
> 2016-06-22 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c: Remove xfail.
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..4058eb58709
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-fstack-check" } */
> +#include "20031023-1.c"
>
Hi,
A minor comment at this stage: this new test fails to compile for
thumb-1 targets:
testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c:27:1: sorry,
unimplemented: -fstack-check=specific for Thumb-1
for instance on arm-none-linux-gnueabi --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-a9
and forcing -march=armv5t in runtest flags.
Is there a clean way to make it unsupported?
Thanks,
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 17:21 Jeff Law
2017-06-22 17:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-06-23 14:58 ` Jeff Law
2017-06-22 17:29 ` Mike Stump
2017-06-23 11:15 ` Christophe Lyon [this message]
2017-06-23 15:03 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKdteOaE=-T-nY3vYDdS9SpP7ZoExXS5kUeOiHYx36GdoxKC3g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).