From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2015 21:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8440 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2015 21:33:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qg0-f52.google.com Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f52.google.com) (209.85.192.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:33:15 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id z107so4570264qgd.11 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:33:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m29jz/h6kxux8Uam97rMJwsTnwhoFQYbN9XKHvryPgc=; b=kndE64AbI5lO0j3eF2ZQDHk7320mm1sZEgHxVoGaU7UCZTY5iHVb9L3cm9BX6e7MpB aY8wKVXhGcJs/h/KV9uiV4RhLquWdEjMN2tgIHP9PWBY65Gl57QqUt0XK+IVaEhzCRMo CErojqa4CJWPhi1rhNdYAGUnYVc+rtDXXZ0iewBjaVNHny2M7SmXMKCH76uTkinhxV+u FR3vat48Qv+uoQSgbAMcocsmOv3xj8sP8m2Yw8bM68tDWabzrYCwWg9Jim1yFdOLBL2H 3D1rJNP99m00S/tvLp6nBcBxWelq8TWbf6/QSAREpNfarbXK1d8LXzF8aRFJHkxDwAiB wR5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlREOtao596cw57jBAEB+kwoeGcxwGBCQQUeR5Kxuk9BU4eeeNVqUR+uao5cThJ6nz9pkk1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.36.199 with SMTP id u7mr34975287qad.72.1422221592780; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:33:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.95.194 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:33:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5491B70F.7080209@arm.com> References: <000701cfff29$ea4fbcf0$beef36d0$@arm.com> <54919DF7.4090407@arm.com> <5491B70F.7080209@arm.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New patch: [AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Make large opaque integer modes endianness-safe. From: Christophe Lyon To: Tejas Belagod Cc: Marcus Shawcroft , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg02211.txt.bz2 On 17 December 2014 at 18:02, Tejas Belagod wrote: > On 17/12/14 16:46, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: >> >> On 17 December 2014 at 15:15, Tejas Belagod wrote: >> >>>> It isn;t clear to me how far through the various BE patches we need to >>>> get before 59810 is actually resolved? >>> >>> >>> >>> David's 2 patches >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01431.html >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01099.html >>> >>> and Alan's 2 patches: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02797.html >> >> >> OK, thanks, my understanding is that all of the above are now blocked >> waiting some resolution on this patch to rtlanal.c: > > > I believe so. > > Thanks, > Tejas. > Hi, If I'm not mistaken, this has been committed as r219959, and is causing regressions on aarch64_be for several AdvSimd intrinsic tests: vldX_lane, vtrn, vuzp, vzip, as well as vldN_1 and vstN_1 See: http://abe.tcwglab.linaro.org/logs/validations/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/219959/report-build-info.html These tests started passing at the previous commit (r219958) with the other half of this patch. I haven't looked at the details yet. Christophe. >> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01087.html >> >> >> /Marcus >> > >