From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 85956 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2017 07:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85899 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2017 07:40:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-ua0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-ua0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:40:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ua0-f171.google.com with SMTP id g40so32166520uaa.3 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:40:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jv3+PUt62x7Dvas6jQQIqLc6Mdc3M/g2Eo9KwyHuf1I=; b=HaxWhTQ3rOUsI3OhhyZMfXjpZ/nOLNT0HAIKxpSRMtqTi7aNFE9TXe3Jrw/z/DbvnZ r7Hzamy+N/57Cg4rf3+Q4I3+5xQEzgS6zIznEWxbuBO1OVWInZMPgaTtv+nlk3HZf5F6 DEkbGTPBeGST03FLhwSsBEK1Tprv9x1KMUC04AMF0iOLLrpZOwxZBp/UXDjzwjvCTStU UVag2D/kNanmNXMWQG/RuAAsxKBT68emG6xZUOOaALpVAct8vyrhN2ma4XdpnoInDjK0 N4HPERNol3cYHckuii65B2rfCE1h9DYJz9M4e2USS8Vew4iiATiyVUXRbDgybjnT9+8k iBCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz6FrAfav0UYo3GYbjkxOw7EBi2sjGV/GxZuY+eMKf0CZtqa2Gd UJG/GFnBtKokApyT0Kl2dJ8irLSfA02O X-Received: by 10.176.94.104 with SMTP id a40mr5051609uah.85.1498203607117; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:40:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.148.220 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:40:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20170609140804.GI53583@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20170619111135.GC72026@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <62ae8f2a-0e53-5177-afa4-4314f118c3cc@suse.cz> <20170621082654.GC32517@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <116ae1cb-0aeb-def9-cf7a-6d1816616f80@suse.cz> From: Christophe Lyon Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make early return predictor more precise. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: Jan Hubicka , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01739.txt.bz2 On 23 June 2017 at 09:03, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > On 06/22/2017 04:14 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> Since this commit (r249450), I have noticed a regression: >> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ipa-split-5.c scan-tree-dump optimized "part" >> on aarch64/arm >> >> Christophe > > Hello. > > I'm aware of the failure and I fixed that (hopefully) in r249503. > Can you please test that? > Yes, I can confirm it's now OK. Thanks > Thanks, > Martin