From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7320 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2015 17:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7309 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2015 17:52:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qc0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:52:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id i17so2276016qcy.2 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:52:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FzaIoWKqINS3DTSCvdN/1/zDML//6Ewp+3GgzE4fVEM=; b=lUER+aUpS8o6B1NQi6XFep1mPbnBdbd17mJRON8muN6eETMj8C3pM/hDm2WnxCavzY HeBLGIN9o60wVsmISWIqgbJSwVzf+2k3X3OuY12D0fRo4rZXG31iXdd64SyHLvcuk+5V 00e7fVqdRA85VM5S3uYZmo8Zwo8BMy9lGYxiMzeunIgozWvj35Ywot9E1U66s695bKep 9Kfz6e8H617ce4MVC/Gp8nlif3aA2LreSS+T8ZUiiSHB2IGBIE245IuqvA3nVpfnnoXc ou9d6vW2q4GMIUZ/CSSBRBRCYUAz5dsZ9h7nAnvOef3qvUaPbNjoKzN8v7ceCxecDHhQ sAWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnicTmqOhuzBfkhMhEOqDN5UcDvJa2CBvLUFGeVsN2+rnnBix9KE+WLBb5EkjiQgcHiEncz MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.28.200 with SMTP id 66mr16680007qgz.16.1421430770606; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:52:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.84.176 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:52:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1421162314-25779-1-git-send-email-christophe.lyon@linaro.org> <1421162314-25779-4-git-send-email-christophe.lyon@linaro.org> <54B9187A.7000406@arm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [[ARM/AArch64][testsuite] 03/36] Add vmax, vmin, vhadd, vhsub and vrhadd tests. From: Christophe Lyon To: Marcus Shawcroft Cc: Tejas Belagod , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01449.txt.bz2 On 16 January 2015 at 18:14, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: > On 16 January 2015 at 16:21, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >> My existing tests only cover armv7 so far. >> I do plan to expand them once they are all in GCC. >> >>> Otherwise, they look good to me(but I can't approve it). >>> >>> Tejas. >>> > > OK provided, as per the previous couple, that we don;t regression or > introduce new fails on aarch64[_be] or aarch32. This patch shows failures on aarch64 and aarch64_be for vmax and vmin when the input is -NaN. It's a corner case, and my reading of the ARM ARM is that the result should the same as on aarch32. I haven't had time to look at it in more details though. So, not OK? > /Marcus