From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: "Uecker, Martin" <Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: "joseph@codesourcery.com" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C PATCH] Drop qualifiers during lvalue conversion
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:55:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKdteObMERokhvKaUCFuF85OmzJKY6iOYWbb1jRE8=1H9za=Hg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605767671.17115.1.camel@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 07:34, Uecker, Martin
<Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Here is another version of the patch. The
> only difference is the additional the check
> using 'tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion'.
>
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> C: Drop qualifiers during lvalue conversion. PR97702
>
> 2020-11-XX Martin Uecker <muecker@gwdg.de>
>
> gcc/
> * gcc/gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Optimizie
> NOP_EXPRs that contain compound literals.
>
> gcc/c/
> * c-typeck.c (convert_lvalue_to_rvalue): Drop qualifiers.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.dg/cond-constqual-1.c: Adapt test.
> * gcc.dg/lvalue-11.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/pr60195.c: Add warning.
>
>
>
This patch causes a regression on arm:
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/struct-union.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fixed-point/struct-union.c:60:8: warning: value
computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fixed-point/struct-union.c:61:9: warning: value
computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
The test in question lines 60-61 are:
/* Test assignment to volatile structure members. */
sv.f = 0.06r;
sv.lf = 0.07lr;
so it seems these assignments are now illegally removed.
Can you check?
Thanks,
Christophe
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> index 413109c916c..286f3d9cd6c 100644
> --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> @@ -2080,6 +2080,9 @@ convert_lvalue_to_rvalue (location_t loc, struct c_expr exp,
> exp = default_function_array_conversion (loc, exp);
> if (!VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (exp.value)))
> exp.value = require_complete_type (loc, exp.value);
> + if (convert_p && !error_operand_p (exp.value)
> + && (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (exp.value)) != ARRAY_TYPE))
> + exp.value = convert (build_qualified_type (TREE_TYPE (exp.value), TYPE_UNQUALIFIED),
> exp.value);
> if (really_atomic_lvalue (exp.value))
> {
> vec<tree, va_gc> *params;
> diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
> index 2566ec7f0af..fd0b5202b45 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
> @@ -5518,6 +5518,19 @@ gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p, tree *from_p, tree *to_p,
> return GS_OK;
> }
>
> + case NOP_EXPR:
> + /* Pull out compound literal expressions from a NOP_EXPR.
> + Those are created in the C FE to drop qualifiers during
> + lvalue conversion. */
> + if ((TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (*from_p, 0)) == COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR)
> + && tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion (*from_p))
> + {
> + *from_p = TREE_OPERAND (*from_p, 0);
> + ret = GS_OK;
> + changed = true;
> + }
> + break;
> +
> case COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR:
> {
> tree complit = TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cond-constqual-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cond-constqual-1.c
> index 3354c7214a4..b5a09cb0038 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cond-constqual-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cond-constqual-1.c
> @@ -11,5 +11,5 @@ test (void)
> __typeof__ (1 ? foo (0) : 0) texpr;
> __typeof__ (1 ? i : 0) texpr2;
> texpr = 0; /* { dg-bogus "read-only variable" "conditional expression with call to const
> function" } */
> - texpr2 = 0; /* { dg-error "read-only variable" "conditional expression with const variable" } */
> + texpr2 = 0; /* { dg-bogus "read-only variable" "conditional expression with const variable" } */
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lvalue-11.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lvalue-11.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..45a97d86890
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lvalue-11.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* test that lvalue conversions drops qualifiers, Bug 97702 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "" } */
> +
> +
> +void f(void)
> +{
> + const int j;
> + typeof((0,j)) i10; i10 = j;;
> + typeof(+j) i11; i11 = j;;
> + typeof(-j) i12; i12 = j;;
> + typeof(1?j:0) i13; i13 = j;;
> + typeof((int)j) i14; i14 = j;;
> + typeof((const int)j) i15; i15 = j;;
> +}
> +
> +void g(void)
> +{
> + volatile int j;
> + typeof((0,j)) i21; i21 = j;;
> + typeof(+j) i22; i22 = j;;
> + typeof(-j) i23; i23 = j;;
> + typeof(1?j:0) i24; i24 = j;;
> + typeof((int)j) i25; i25 = j;;
> + typeof((volatile int)j) i26; i26 = j;;
> +}
> +
> +void h(void)
> +{
> + _Atomic int j;
> + typeof((0,j)) i32; i32 = j;;
> + typeof(+j) i33; i33 = j;;
> + typeof(-j) i34; i34 = j;;
> + typeof(1?j:0) i35; i35 = j;;
> + typeof((int)j) i36; i36 = j;;
> + typeof((_Atomic int)j) i37; i37 = j;;
> +}
> +
> +void e(void)
> +{
> + int* restrict j;
> + typeof((0,j)) i43; i43 = j;;
> + typeof(1?j:0) i44; i44 = j;;
> + typeof((int*)j) i45; i45 = j;;
> + typeof((int* restrict)j) i46; i46 = j;;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr60195.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr60195.c
> index 0a50a30be25..8eccf7f63ad 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr60195.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr60195.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ atomic_int
> fn2 (void)
> {
> atomic_int y = 0;
> - y;
> + y; /* { dg-warning "statement with no effect" } */
> return y;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-07 15:17 [C PATCH RFC] " Uecker, Martin
2020-11-09 23:41 ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-15 20:26 ` Uecker, Martin
2020-11-16 22:50 ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-19 6:34 ` [C PATCH] " Uecker, Martin
2020-11-19 18:58 ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-19 19:34 ` Uecker, Martin
2020-11-19 20:53 ` Joseph Myers
2020-11-23 13:55 ` Christophe Lyon [this message]
2020-11-23 15:26 ` Uecker, Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKdteObMERokhvKaUCFuF85OmzJKY6iOYWbb1jRE8=1H9za=Hg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=christophe.lyon@linaro.org \
--cc=Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).