From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-334244-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18015 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 16:58:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 18005 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2012 16:58:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:58:06 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a19so912426qad.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:58:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=q/6Oj1kNfURPsHxy4d2o6SgLP5yTxsMjmOm8Ddy/xCA=;        b=pHFohPStjQ/57oO5dkyBGlQNCV6mMkUxg0SpaHgO+JHTq6HMGOQ2J7OH80QThroZbV         7DMQsab88P7yZB12e3dESPYxFb2Dlth5qMgNv2cLxFGNj2aDeqnQaYj0sTnZvYAN4JmM         WateSewnWeZoKxzEo53dMl7eH9sk+avGO7CBp+Xn3g2jj+L6EGX2mrcGY5LNMOG2qY80         F+A5e6E2CQR9f0RJeYDePp905Td3EYZ2wzPXTLSUGxNqRHq5pjmtr/ygBqBxvJDL1GXz         aChB1On7ZMmxkrquWdGB+wDQlhKIbtWKGifI81TluHZiMqwbC5uIVGYrJ3GbYyoGN3e/         8Glg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.2.35 with SMTP id 3mr3111402qer.36.1355504285771; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.6.102 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:58:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdteOaTdLs19Pz5jngpWdx8dqX-Tc3rhkrLJAinLTZDarDatA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKdteOafeC0sn5rTkVykkBqefd3rM4pvSRqdHgZmaUuZ8Ts=YA@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1211292057530.27729@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAKdteOZBDfaSt341ssmPniT5_6-3mHcKJRiRC_BM0+FLCi_4aQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKdteOaTdLs19Pz5jngpWdx8dqX-Tc3rhkrLJAinLTZDarDatA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKdteObXjej4vRT+rSho5Q+Ng5eKrPjYwAj+A3E_KJ7aaPrtqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ARM] Turning off 64bits ops in Neon and gfortran/modulo-scheduling problem
From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjdHdQ8yNplmFCwJB17tvNWFuCVheSXZc/j0ESm2tmCviU6PQdvjLMrDzzo1LRmYkvAorU
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00986.txt.bz2

Ping^2?

On 7 December 2012 09:34, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> Ping?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02558.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christophe.