From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32641 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2012 22:54:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 32616 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2012 22:53:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:53:48 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j4so783182bkw.20 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:53:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.12.206 with SMTP id y14mr2269956bky.132.1354488826963; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:53:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.202.73 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:53:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50B890A6.3090505@net-b.de> References: <50B5067B.9070005@net-b.de> <50B7FEA5.7060508@net-b.de> <50B890A6.3090505@net-b.de> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] No-op Patch - a.k.a. FINAL wrapper update From: Janus Weil To: Tobias Burnus Cc: gcc patches , gfortran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 Hi Tobias, >> In my version of the patch I introduced a routine 'gfc_is_finalizable' to >> perform this decision. > > > Okay. How about the following patch? It's the same without the renaming. > > Build an regtested on x86-64-linux.* > OK for the trunk? Yes, looks ok to me. Thanks for the patch! Cheers, Janus