From: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
Hongtao Liu <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] Add loop masking support for x86
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:20:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZc-bx6iRMqignBhUAqtS-O+d1SQMvERUcODyOWxfyFo6AD6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2YyTZ-4+ab8oPAN_9z3OF52qenRwpf=Pifkm6r8r8NSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:45 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > The following extends the existing loop masking support using
> > SVE WHILE_ULT to x86 by proving an alternate way to produce the
> > mask using VEC_COND_EXPRs. So with --param vect-partial-vector-usage
> > you can now enable masked vectorized epilogues (=1) or fully
> > masked vector loops (=2).
> >
> > What's missing is using a scalar IV for the loop control
> > (but in principle AVX512 can use the mask here - just the patch
> > doesn't seem to work for AVX512 yet for some reason - likely
> > expand_vec_cond_expr_p doesn't work there). What's also missing
> > is providing more support for predicated operations in the case
> > of reductions either via VEC_COND_EXPRs or via implementing
> > some of the .COND_{ADD,SUB,MUL...} internal functions as mapping
> > to masked AVX512 operations.
> >
> > For AVX2 and
> >
> > int foo (unsigned *a, unsigned * __restrict b, int n)
> > {
> > unsigned sum = 1;
> > for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> > b[i] += a[i];
> > return sum;
> > }
> >
> > we get
> >
> > .L3:
> > vpmaskmovd (%rsi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm3
> > vpmaskmovd (%rdi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm1
> > addl $8, %edx
> > vpaddd %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
> > vpmaskmovd %ymm1, %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax)
> > vmovd %edx, %xmm1
> > vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm2, %ymm0
> > addq $32, %rax
> > vpbroadcastd %xmm1, %ymm1
> > vpaddd %ymm4, %ymm1, %ymm1
> > vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm1, %ymm1
> > vpcmpgtd %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
> > vptest %ymm0, %ymm0
> > jne .L3
> >
> > for the fully masked loop body and for the masked epilogue
> > we see
> >
> > .L4:
> > vmovdqu (%rsi,%rax), %ymm3
> > vpaddd (%rdi,%rax), %ymm3, %ymm0
> > vmovdqu %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax)
> > addq $32, %rax
> > cmpq %rax, %rcx
> > jne .L4
> > movl %edx, %eax
> > andl $-8, %eax
> > testb $7, %dl
> > je .L11
> > .L3:
> > subl %eax, %edx
> > vmovdqa .LC0(%rip), %ymm1
> > salq $2, %rax
> > vmovd %edx, %xmm0
> > movl $-2147483648, %edx
> > addq %rax, %rsi
> > vmovd %edx, %xmm15
> > vpbroadcastd %xmm0, %ymm0
> > vpbroadcastd %xmm15, %ymm15
> > vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm1, %ymm1
> > vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm0, %ymm0
> > vpcmpgtd %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
> > vpmaskmovd (%rsi), %ymm0, %ymm1
> > vpmaskmovd (%rdi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm2
> > vpaddd %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
> > vpmaskmovd %ymm1, %ymm0, (%rsi)
> > .L11:
> > vzeroupper
> >
> > compared to
> >
> > .L3:
> > movl %edx, %r8d
> > subl %eax, %r8d
> > leal -1(%r8), %r9d
> > cmpl $2, %r9d
> > jbe .L6
> > leaq (%rcx,%rax,4), %r9
> > vmovdqu (%rdi,%rax,4), %xmm2
> > movl %r8d, %eax
> > andl $-4, %eax
> > vpaddd (%r9), %xmm2, %xmm0
> > addl %eax, %esi
> > andl $3, %r8d
> > vmovdqu %xmm0, (%r9)
> > je .L2
> > .L6:
> > movslq %esi, %r8
> > leaq 0(,%r8,4), %rax
> > movl (%rdi,%r8,4), %r8d
> > addl %r8d, (%rcx,%rax)
> > leal 1(%rsi), %r8d
> > cmpl %r8d, %edx
> > jle .L2
> > addl $2, %esi
> > movl 4(%rdi,%rax), %r8d
> > addl %r8d, 4(%rcx,%rax)
> > cmpl %esi, %edx
> > jle .L2
> > movl 8(%rdi,%rax), %edx
> > addl %edx, 8(%rcx,%rax)
> > .L2:
> >
> > I'm giving this a little testing right now but will dig on why
> > I don't get masked loops when AVX512 is enabled.
>
> Ah, a simple thinko - rgroup_controls vectypes seem to be
> always VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P and thus we can
> use expand_vec_cmp_expr_p. The AVX512 fully masked
> loop then looks like
>
> .L3:
> vmovdqu32 (%rsi,%rax,4), %ymm2{%k1}
> vmovdqu32 (%rdi,%rax,4), %ymm1{%k1}
> vpaddd %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm0
> vmovdqu32 %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax,4){%k1}
> addq $8, %rax
> vpbroadcastd %eax, %ymm0
> vpaddd %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
> vpcmpud $6, %ymm0, %ymm3, %k1
> kortestb %k1, %k1
> jne .L3
>
> I guess for x86 it's not worth preserving the VEC_COND_EXPR
> mask generation but other archs may not provide all required vec_cmp
> expanders.
For the main loop, the full-masked loop's codegen seems much worse.
Basically, we need at least 4 instructions to do what while_ult in arm does.
vpbroadcastd %eax, %ymm0
vpaddd %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
vpcmpud $6, %ymm0, %ymm3, %k1
kortestb %k1, %k1
vs
whilelo(or some other while<op>)
more instructions are needed for avx2 since there's no direct
instruction for .COND_{ADD,SUB..}
original
.L4:
vmovdqu (%rcx,%rax), %ymm1
vpaddd (%rdi,%rax), %ymm1, %ymm0
vmovdqu %ymm0, (%rcx,%rax)
addq $32, %rax
cmpq %rax, %rsi
jne .L4
vs
avx512 full-masked loop
.L3:
vmovdqu32 (%rsi,%rax,4), %ymm2{%k1}
vmovdqu32 (%rdi,%rax,4), %ymm1{%k1}
vpaddd %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm0
vmovdqu32 %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax,4){%k1}
addq $8, %rax
vpbroadcastd %eax, %ymm0
vpaddd %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0
vpcmpud $6, %ymm0, %ymm3, %k1
kortestb %k1, %k1
jne .L3
vs
avx2 full-masked loop
.L3:
vpmaskmovd (%rsi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm3
vpmaskmovd (%rdi,%rax), %ymm0, %ymm1
addl $8, %edx
vpaddd %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1
vpmaskmovd %ymm1, %ymm0, (%rsi,%rax)
vmovd %edx, %xmm1
vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm2, %ymm0
addq $32, %rax
vpbroadcastd %xmm1, %ymm1
vpaddd %ymm4, %ymm1, %ymm1
vpsubd %ymm15, %ymm1, %ymm1
vpcmpgtd %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
vptest %ymm0, %ymm0
jne .L3
vs arm64's code
.L3:
ld1w z1.s, p0/z, [x1, x3, lsl 2]
ld1w z0.s, p0/z, [x0, x3, lsl 2]
add z0.s, z0.s, z1.s
st1w z0.s, p0, [x1, x3, lsl 2]
add x3, x3, x4
whilelo p0.s, w3, w2
b.any .L3
> Richard.
>
> > Still comments are appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> > 2021-07-15 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> >
> > * tree-vect-stmts.c (can_produce_all_loop_masks_p): We
> > also can produce masks with VEC_COND_EXPRs.
> > * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_gen_while): Generate the mask
> > with a VEC_COND_EXPR in case WHILE_ULT is not supported.
> > ---
> > gcc/tree-vect-loop.c | 8 ++++++-
> > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> > index fc3dab0d143..2214ed11dfb 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
> > @@ -975,11 +975,17 @@ can_produce_all_loop_masks_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, tree cmp_type)
> > {
> > rgroup_controls *rgm;
> > unsigned int i;
> > + tree cmp_vectype;
> > FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo), i, rgm)
> > if (rgm->type != NULL_TREE
> > && !direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
> > cmp_type, rgm->type,
> > - OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> > + OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED)
> > + && ((cmp_vectype
> > + = truth_type_for (build_vector_type
> > + (cmp_type, TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (rgm->type)))),
> > + true)
> > + && !expand_vec_cond_expr_p (rgm->type, cmp_vectype, LT_EXPR))
> > return false;
> > return true;
> > }
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > index 6a25d661800..216986399b1 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > @@ -12007,16 +12007,46 @@ vect_gen_while (gimple_seq *seq, tree mask_type, tree start_index,
> > tree end_index, const char *name)
> > {
> > tree cmp_type = TREE_TYPE (start_index);
> > - gcc_checking_assert (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
> > - cmp_type, mask_type,
> > - OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED));
> > - gcall *call = gimple_build_call_internal (IFN_WHILE_ULT, 3,
> > - start_index, end_index,
> > - build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> > - tree tmp = make_temp_ssa_name (mask_type, NULL, name);
> > - gimple_call_set_lhs (call, tmp);
> > - gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, call);
> > - return tmp;
> > + if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_WHILE_ULT,
> > + cmp_type, mask_type,
> > + OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> > + {
> > + gcall *call = gimple_build_call_internal (IFN_WHILE_ULT, 3,
> > + start_index, end_index,
> > + build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> > + tree tmp = make_temp_ssa_name (mask_type, NULL, name);
> > + gimple_call_set_lhs (call, tmp);
> > + gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, call);
> > + return tmp;
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + /* Generate
> > + _1 = { start_index, start_index, ... };
> > + _2 = { end_index, end_index, ... };
> > + _3 = _1 + { 0, 1, 2 ... };
> > + _4 = _3 < _2;
> > + _5 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_4, { -1, -1, ... } : { 0, 0, ... }>; */
> > + tree cvectype = build_vector_type (cmp_type,
> > + TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (mask_type));
> > + tree si = make_ssa_name (cvectype);
> > + gassign *ass = gimple_build_assign
> > + (si, build_vector_from_val (cvectype, start_index));
> > + gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, ass);
> > + tree ei = make_ssa_name (cvectype);
> > + ass = gimple_build_assign (ei,
> > + build_vector_from_val (cvectype, end_index));
> > + gimple_seq_add_stmt (seq, ass);
> > + tree incr = build_vec_series (cvectype, build_zero_cst (cmp_type),
> > + build_one_cst (cmp_type));
> > + si = gimple_build (seq, PLUS_EXPR, cvectype, si, incr);
> > + tree cmp = gimple_build (seq, LT_EXPR, truth_type_for (cvectype),
> > + si, ei);
> > + tree mask = gimple_build (seq, VEC_COND_EXPR, mask_type, cmp,
> > + build_all_ones_cst (mask_type),
> > + build_zero_cst (mask_type));
> > + return mask;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Generate a vector mask of type MASK_TYPE for which index I is false iff
> > --
> > 2.26.2
--
BR,
Hongtao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 10:30 Richard Biener
2021-07-15 10:45 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 11:20 ` Hongtao Liu [this message]
2021-07-15 11:48 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 14:57 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-15 15:15 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 15:31 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-16 9:11 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20 4:20 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-20 7:38 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20 11:07 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-20 11:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21 7:57 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-21 8:16 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21 9:38 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-21 10:13 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-16 1:46 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-07-16 6:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-15 13:49 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-07-15 13:54 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20 13:48 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-21 6:17 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMZc-bx6iRMqignBhUAqtS-O+d1SQMvERUcODyOWxfyFo6AD6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).