From: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sanitizer: [PR110027] Align asan_vec[0] to MAX (alignb, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:34:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZc-bxbQsw4TxfT3UGKGgFPp0=zYUsyYg6q33BMLzco3dnm1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZc-bzHPutbhKx53E0v6tqva9NNcLnw8+DrSVuHaeycpiVyxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:26 AM Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:51 PM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:57:59PM +0800, liuhongt wrote:
> > > if alignb > ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE and offset[0] is not multiple of
> > > alignb. (base_align_bias - base_offset) may not aligned to alignb, and
> > > caused segement fault.
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
> > > Ok for trunk and backport to GCC13?
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > PR sanitizer/110027
> > > * cfgexpand.cc (expand_stack_vars): Align frame offset to
> > > MAX (alignb, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE).
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C: New test.
> > > ---
> > > gcc/cfgexpand.cc | 2 +-
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> > > index 0de299c62e3..92062378d8e 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
> > > @@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ expand_stack_vars (bool (*pred) (size_t), class stack_vars_data *data)
> > > {
> > > if (data->asan_vec.is_empty ())
> > > {
> > > - align_frame_offset (ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE);
> > > + align_frame_offset (MAX (alignb, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE));
> > > prev_offset = frame_offset.to_constant ();
> > > }
> > > prev_offset = align_base (prev_offset,
> >
> > This doesn't look correct to me.
> > The above is done just once for the first var partition. And
> > var partitions are sorted by stack_var_cmp, which puts > MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT
> > alignment vars first (that should be none on x86, the above is quite huge
> > alignment), then on size decreasing and only after that on alignment
> > decreasing.
> >
> > So, try to add some other variable with larger size and smaller alignment
> > to the frame (and make sure it isn't optimized away).
> >
> > alignb above is the alignment of the first partition's var, if
> > align_frame_offset really needs to depend on the var alignment, it probably
> > should be the maximum alignment of all the vars with alignment
> > alignb * BITS_PER_UNIT <= MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT
>
> In asan_emit_stack_protection, when it allocated fake stack, it assume
> bottom of stack is also aligned to alignb. And the place violated this
> is the first var partition. which is 32 bytes offsets, it should be
> MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT.
> So I think we need to use MAX (MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT /
> BITS_PER_UNIT, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE) for the first var partition.
It should be MAX (BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE).
MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT is huge.
>
> >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..0067781bc89
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/pr110027.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > > +/* PR sanitizer/110027 */
> > > +/* { dg-do run } */
> > > +/* { dg-require-effective-target avx512f_runtime } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-std=gnu++23 -mavx512f -fsanitize=address -O0 -g -fstack-protector-strong" } */
> > > +
> > > +#include <cstddef>
> > > +#include <cstdint>
> > > +
> > > +template <ptrdiff_t W, typename T>
> > > +using Vec [[gnu::vector_size(W * sizeof(T))]] = T;
> > > +
> > > +auto foo() {
> > > + Vec<8, int64_t> ret{};
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int main() {
> > > + foo();
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> >
> > Jakub
> >
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao
--
BR,
Hongtao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 11:57 liuhongt
2024-03-13 1:27 ` Hongtao Liu
2024-03-25 12:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-03-26 3:26 ` Hongtao Liu
2024-03-26 3:34 ` Hongtao Liu [this message]
2024-03-26 6:08 ` [PATCH V2] sanitizer: [PR110027] Align asan_vec[0] to MAX (BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT / BITS_PER_UNIT, ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE) liuhongt
2024-04-11 8:38 ` [PATCH] asan, v3: Fix up handling of > 32 byte aligned variables with -fsanitize=address -fstack-protector* [PR110027] Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-11 8:53 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-11 11:13 ` Liu, Hongtao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMZc-bxbQsw4TxfT3UGKGgFPp0=zYUsyYg6q33BMLzco3dnm1A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).