From: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand __builtin_memcmp_eq with ptest for OI/TImode.
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 15:37:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZc-bzhPesoF_ZSN5cbtePWvzLyXbuYbXQpZLuJy5YFKi1kKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505073707.95306-1-hongtao.liu@intel.com>
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 3:37 PM liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Enable optimization for TImode only under 32-bit target, for 64-bit
> target there could be extra ineteger <-> sse move regarding psABI,
> not efficient.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}
> Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/104610
> * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_branch): Use ptest
> for TI/QImode when code is EQ or NE.
> * config/i386/i386.md (SDWIM1248): New iterator.
> (cbranch<mode>4): Split TImode into a separate expander.
> (cbranchti4): New expander.
> * config/i386/predicates.md (timode_comparison_operator): New
> predicate.
> * config/i386/sse.md (cbranch<mode>4): Extend to OImode.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc | 13 +++++++++++-
> gcc/config/i386/i386.md | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> gcc/config/i386/predicates.md | 6 ++++++
> gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 10 +++++++--
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> index bc806ffa283..a2012a158ae 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> @@ -2264,13 +2264,24 @@ ix86_expand_branch (enum rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx label)
> {
> machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (op0);
> rtx tmp;
> + machine_mode p_mode = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 32 ? V4DImode : V2DImode;
> + /* Using ptest for TImode only for 32-bit target since it's splitted into
> + 4 comparisons. For 64-bit target there could be extra ineteger <-> sse
> + move regarding psABI, not efficient. */
> + if ((code == EQ || code == NE)
> + && ((mode == OImode && TARGET_AVX)
> + || (mode == TImode && !TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_SSE4_1)))
> + {
> + op0 = lowpart_subreg (p_mode, force_reg (mode, op0), mode);
> + op1 = lowpart_subreg (p_mode, force_reg (mode, op1), mode);
> + mode = p_mode;
> + }
>
> /* Handle special case - vector comparsion with boolean result, transform
> it using ptest instruction. */
> if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_INT)
> {
> rtx flag = gen_rtx_REG (CCZmode, FLAGS_REG);
> - machine_mode p_mode = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 32 ? V4DImode : V2DImode;
>
> gcc_assert (code == EQ || code == NE);
> /* Generate XOR since we can't check that one operand is zero vector. */
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> index b321cda1f22..f91325015c9 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,10 @@ (define_mode_iterator SDWIM [(QI "TARGET_QIMODE_MATH")
> (HI "TARGET_HIMODE_MATH")
> SI DI (TI "TARGET_64BIT")])
>
> +(define_mode_iterator SDWIM1248 [(QI "TARGET_QIMODE_MATH")
> + (HI "TARGET_HIMODE_MATH")
> + SI DI])
> +
> ;; Math-dependant single word integer modes.
> (define_mode_iterator SWIM [(QI "TARGET_QIMODE_MATH")
> (HI "TARGET_HIMODE_MATH")
> @@ -1322,8 +1326,8 @@ (define_mode_iterator PTR
>
> (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
> [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)
> - (compare:CC (match_operand:SDWIM 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
> - (match_operand:SDWIM 2 "<general_operand>")))
> + (compare:CC (match_operand:SDWIM1248 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
> + (match_operand:SDWIM1248 2 "<general_operand>")))
> (set (pc) (if_then_else
> (match_operator 0 "ordered_comparison_operator"
> [(reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)])
> @@ -1338,6 +1342,25 @@ (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
> DONE;
> })
>
> +(define_expand "cbranchti4"
> + [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)
> + (compare:CC (match_operand:TI 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
> + (match_operand:TI 2 "x86_64_general_operand")))
> + (set (pc) (if_then_else
> + (match_operator 0 "timode_comparison_operator"
> + [(reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)])
> + (label_ref (match_operand 3))
> + (pc)))]
> + "TARGET_64BIT || TARGET_SSE4_1"
> +{
> + if (MEM_P (operands[1]) && MEM_P (operands[2]))
> + operands[1] = force_reg (TImode, operands[1]);
> +
> + ix86_expand_branch (GET_CODE (operands[0]),
> + operands[1], operands[2], operands[3]);
> + DONE;
> +})
> +
> (define_expand "cstore<mode>4"
> [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)
> (compare:CC (match_operand:SWIM 2 "nonimmediate_operand")
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> index a8cc17a054d..fb3be3a262f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> @@ -1414,6 +1414,12 @@ (define_predicate "ix86_comparison_uns_operator"
> (define_predicate "bt_comparison_operator"
> (match_code "ne,eq"))
>
> +(define_predicate "timode_comparison_operator"
> + (ior (and (match_test "TARGET_SSE4_1")
> + (match_operand 0 "bt_comparison_operator"))
> + (and (match_test "TARGET_64BIT")
> + (match_operand 0 "ordered_comparison_operator"))))
> +
> (define_predicate "shr_comparison_operator"
> (match_code "gtu,leu"))
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> index 7b791def542..0d194cee769 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> @@ -26034,10 +26034,14 @@ (define_expand "maskstore<mode><avx512fmaskmodelower>"
> (match_operand:<avx512fmaskmode> 2 "register_operand")))]
> "TARGET_AVX512BW")
>
> +(define_mode_iterator VI48_OI_AVX
> + [(V8SI "TARGET_AVX") (V4DI "TARGET_AVX") (OI "TARGET_AVX")
> + V4SI V2DI])
> +
> (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
> [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)
> - (compare:CC (match_operand:VI48_AVX 1 "register_operand")
> - (match_operand:VI48_AVX 2 "nonimmediate_operand")))
> + (compare:CC (match_operand:VI48_OI_AVX 1 "register_operand")
> + (match_operand:VI48_OI_AVX 2 "nonimmediate_operand")))
> (set (pc) (if_then_else
> (match_operator 0 "bt_comparison_operator"
> [(reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)])
> @@ -26045,6 +26049,8 @@ (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
> (pc)))]
> "TARGET_SSE4_1"
> {
> + if (!vector_operand (operands[2], <MODE>mode))
> + operands[2] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[2]);
> ix86_expand_branch (GET_CODE (operands[0]),
> operands[1], operands[2], operands[3]);
> DONE;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..68f548594fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr104610.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mmove-max=256 -mstore-max=256" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)ptest.*xmm} 1 { target ia32 } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)vptest.*ymm} 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {sete} 2 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {(?n)je.*L[0-9]} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {(?n)jne.*L[0-9]} } } */
> +
> +
> +#include<stdbool.h>
> +__attribute__((target("sse4.1")))
> +bool f128(char *a)
> +{
> + char t[] = "012345678901234";
> + return __builtin_memcmp(a, &t[0], sizeof(t)) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +__attribute__((target("avx")))
> +bool f256(char *a)
> +{
> + char t[] = "0123456789012345678901234567890";
> + return __builtin_memcmp(a, &t[0], sizeof(t)) == 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.18.1
>
--
BR,
Hongtao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 7:37 liuhongt
2022-05-05 7:37 ` Hongtao Liu [this message]
2022-05-05 7:49 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-05 8:08 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-05 8:21 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-05 8:22 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-05-05 8:30 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-07 5:05 ` [PATCH] Expand __builtin_memcmp_eq with ptest for OImode liuhongt
2022-05-09 0:57 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-05-16 1:47 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-05-16 9:10 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-17 1:33 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-05-17 10:03 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-18 2:53 ` Hongtao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMZc-bzhPesoF_ZSN5cbtePWvzLyXbuYbXQpZLuJy5YFKi1kKg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).