public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [CHKP, PATCH] Fix LTO cgraph merge for instrumented functions
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMbmDYYmSMVZrJk709pFtss3_ML+dx8TW3VMZgW-vdnaPY_H5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150403184915.GS21276@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

2015-04-03 21:49 GMT+03:00 Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>:
>> Assembler name of instrumented function is a transparent alias of
>> original function's name.  Alias chains are not taken into account by
>> analysis. Thus we see no conflict between instrumented function's name
>> and a variable name but emit them with the same assembler name. To
>> detect name conflict I keep original function node alive.
>
> Hmm, so lets see if I understand your situation.  You always have transparent alias TA
> and function F connected by IPA_REF_CHKP and because TA is represented as thunk
> you also have a fake call from TA to F?
>
> I do not understand how you can miss the link these days.  I extended lto-cgraph to
> always keep thunk and its target in every unit that reffers to thunk. That should
> solve you problem?  How IPA_REF_CHKP can link get lost?

References are not streamed out for nodes which are referenced in a
partition but don't belong to it ('continue' condition in output_refs
loop).

>
> I suppose we still need to
>  1) write_symbol and lto-symtab should know that transparent aliases are not real
>     symbols and ignore them. We have predicate symtab_node::real_symbol_p,
>     I suppose it should return true.
>
>     I think cgraph_merge and varpool_merge in lto-symtab needs to know what to do
>     when merging two symbols with transparent aliases.
>  2) At some point we need to populate transparent alias links as discussed in the
>     other thread.
>  3) For safety, I guess we want symbol_table::change_decl_assembler_name to either
>     sanity check there are no trasparent alias links pointing to old assembler
>     names or update it.

Wouldn't search for possible referring via transparent aliases nodes
be too expensive?

>  4) I think we want verify_node to check that transparent alias links and chkp points
>     as intended and only on those symbols where they need to be
>
> There is also logic in lto-partition to always insert alias target
>> > OK, so you have the chkp references that links to instrumented_version.
>> > You do not stream them for boundary symbols but for some reason they are needed,
>> > but when you can end up with wrong CHKP link?
>>
>> Wrong links may appear when cgraph nodes are merged.
>
> I see, I think you really want to fix these at merging time as sugested in 1).
> In this case even the node->instrumented_version pointer may be out of date and
> point to a node that lost in merging?

node->instrumented_version is redirected and never points to lost
symbol. But during merge we may have situations when
(node->instrumented_version->instrumented_version != node) because of
multiple not merged (yet) symbols referencing the same merged target.

Thanks,
Ilya

>
> Honza
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ilya

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-06 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-12 12:10 Ilya Enkovich
2015-03-19  8:35 ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-04-02 14:52   ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-04-02 17:01     ` Jan Hubicka
2015-04-03  7:54       ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-04-03 18:49         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-04-06 13:57           ` Ilya Enkovich [this message]
2015-04-10  1:15             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-04-14  9:16               ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-05-05  8:06                 ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-05-19  9:40                   ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-05-26 13:09                     ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-05-29  6:33                       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMbmDYYmSMVZrJk709pFtss3_ML+dx8TW3VMZgW-vdnaPY_H5A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=enkovich.gnu@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).