public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR target/65103, 3/3] Change rtx cost for i386 address constants
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMbmDYZAucYKYqDBmM7cO8bfsyrD_mHwh_sGtusLGifnhmuQjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150310161437.GG27860@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>

Ping

2015-03-10 19:14 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>:
> On 10 Mar 18:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch changes rtx cost for address constants to 0 similar to what we have in address cost hook beacuse we expect them to be propagated into address expression anyway.  Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk or stage 1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ilya
>
> Updated ChangeLog and test.
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2015-03-10  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
>         PR target/65103
>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_rtx_costs): We want to propagate
>         link time constants into adress expressions and therefore set
>         their cost to 0.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2015-03-10  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
>         PR target/65103
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr65103-3.c: New.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index b3971b8..341a157 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -42039,7 +42039,8 @@ ix86_rtx_costs (rtx x, int code_i, int outer_code_i, int opno, int *total,
>                && !(TARGET_64BIT
>                     && (GET_CODE (x) == LABEL_REF
>                         || (GET_CODE (x) == SYMBOL_REF
> -                           && SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x)))))
> +                           && SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (x))))
> +              && (TARGET_64BIT || GET_CODE (x) != CONST))
>         *total = 1;
>        else
>         *total = 0;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65103-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65103-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..eddf20b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65103-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target pie } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fPIE" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "GOTOFF," } } */
> +
> +static int *data[100];
> +
> +void test (long a, long b)
> +{
> +  do
> +    {
> +      if( a < b )
> +        {
> +         data[a] = data[b];
> +         a++;
> +        }
> +    }
> +  while (a <= b);
> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-12 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-10 15:11 Ilya Enkovich
2015-03-10 16:14 ` Ilya Enkovich
2015-05-12 14:43   ` Ilya Enkovich [this message]
2015-05-12 15:47 Uros Bizjak
2015-05-13  8:39 ` Ilya Enkovich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMbmDYZAucYKYqDBmM7cO8bfsyrD_mHwh_sGtusLGifnhmuQjg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=enkovich.gnu@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).