On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:46 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: >>>> On 11/20/2015 01:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Richard Biener >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Empty record should be returned and passed the same way in C and C++. >>>>>>> This patch adds LANG_HOOKS_EMPTY_RECORD_P for C++ empty class, which >>>>>>> defaults to return false. For C++, LANG_HOOKS_EMPTY_RECORD_P is defined >>>>>>> to is_really_empty_class, which returns true for C++ empty classes. For >>>>>>> LTO, we stream out a bit to indicate if a record is empty and we store >>>>>>> it in TYPE_LANG_FLAG_0 when streaming in. get_ref_base_and_extent is >>>>>>> changed to set bitsize to 0 for empty records. Middle-end and x86 >>>>>>> backend are updated to ignore empty records for parameter passing and >>>>>>> function value return. Other targets may need similar changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please avoid a new langhook for this and instead claim a bit in >>>>>> tree_type_common >>>>>> like for example restrict_flag (double-check it is unused for >>>>>> non-pointers). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There is no bit in tree_type_common I can overload. restrict_flag is >>>>> checked for non-pointers to issue an error when it is used on >>>>> non-pointers: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/qualttp20.C:19:38: >>>>> error: ‘__restrict__’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘AS::L’ >>>>> typedef typename T::L __restrict__ r;// { dg-error "'__restrict__' >>>>> qualifiers cannot" "" } >>>> >>>> >>>> The C++ front end only needs to check TYPE_RESTRICT for this purpose on >>>> front-end-specific type codes like TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM; cp_type_quals could >>>> handle that specifically if you change TYPE_RESTRICT to only apply to >>>> pointers. >>>> >>> >>> restrict_flag is also checked in this case: >>> >>> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat x.i >>> struct dummy { }; >>> >>> struct dummy >>> foo (struct dummy __restrict__ i) >>> { >>> return i; >>> } >>> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ gcc -S x.i -Wall >>> x.i:4:13: error: invalid use of ‘restrict’ >>> foo (struct dummy __restrict__ i) >>> ^ >>> x.i:4:13: error: invalid use of ‘restrict’ >>> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ >>> >>> restrict_flag can't also be used to indicate `i' is an empty record. >> >> I'm sure this error can be done during parsing w/o relying on TYPE_RESTRICT. >> >> But well, use any other free bit (but do not enlarge >> tree_type_common). Eventually >> you can free up a bit by putting sth into type_lang_specific currently >> using bits >> in tree_type_common. > > There are no bits in tree_type_common I can move. Instead, > this patch overloads side_effects_flag in tree_base. Tested on > Linux/x86-64. OK for trunk? > > Thanks. > > -- > H.J. -- H.J.