From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-408841-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5754 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2015 13:37:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5680 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2015 13:37:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f176.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:37:44 +0000
Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so57720855obb.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.60.37 with SMTP id e5mr5856014obr.22.1443706661391; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.175.132 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4Y9_Me_bq6d=DdhcrJ1biNgUhCkOD40P19WzQiHfUw7EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE0nxxjb=nUAuHt28Nt_CNq=7h0BSXT5bgm2i=iopaYc7DpODw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4Y9_Me_bq6d=DdhcrJ1biNgUhCkOD40P19WzQiHfUw7EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:37:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoEDXJ7qT0r65A41AFscFJmfAkW2oX5DL07M8KVVpaCdw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tune for lakemont
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Yulia Koval <vaalfreja@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Yulia Koval <vaalfreja@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch below contains some tuning changes for Lakemont, introduced
>> by H.J. Lu. Bootstraped/regtested for Linux/x86_64. Ok for trunk?
>>
>>         * gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def (X86_TUNE_USE_BT): Enable
>>         for Lakemont.
>>         (X86_TUNE_ZERO_EXTEND_WITH_AND): Disable for Lakemont.
>
> Non-algorithmic tuning of various parameters, especially the ones in
> x86-tune.def, is always OK and pre-approved as an "obvious" patch.
>

Checked in.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.