From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Call get_available_features for all CPUs with max_level >= 1 [PR100758]
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 07:30:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoFo6uY5qEbdpJ+PRu+F7Wk65=E-COctRS0mUmPhv=Lsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+TjBOP6PzjLP4Ua@tucnak>
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 4:12 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> get_available_features doesn't depend on cpu_model2->__cpu_{family,model}
> and just sets stuff up based on CPUID leaf 1, or some extended ones,
> so I wonder why are we calling it separately for Intel, AMD and Zhaoxin
> and not for all other CPUs too? I think various programs in the wild
> which aren't using __builtin_cpu_{is,supports} just check the various CPUID
> leafs and query bits in there, without blacklisting unknown CPU vendors,
> so I think even __builtin_cpu_supports ("sse2") etc. should be reliable
> if those VENDOR_{CENTAUR,CYRIX,NSC,OTHER} CPUs set those bits in CPUID leaf
> 1 or some extended ones. Calling it for all CPUs also means it can be
> inlined because there will be just a single caller.
>
> I will test on Intel but can't test it on non-Intel (or with some extra
> effort on AMD; for both of those arches it should be really no change in
> behavior).
>
> Thoughts on this?
No objection here. It just isn't easy to verify CPUID behavior on
other processors.
Thanks.
> 2023-02-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR target/100758
> * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_zhaoxin_cpu): Formatting fixes.
> (cpu_indicator_init): Call get_available_features for all CPUs with
> max_level >= 1, rather than just Intel, AMD or Zhaoxin. Formatting
> fixes.
>
> --- gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h.jj 2023-01-16 11:52:15.910736614 +0100
> +++ gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h 2023-02-09 12:51:23.539470140 +0100
> @@ -601,8 +601,8 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model
>
> static inline const char *
> get_zhaoxin_cpu (struct __processor_model *cpu_model,
> - struct __processor_model2 *cpu_model2,
> - unsigned int *cpu_features2)
> + struct __processor_model2 *cpu_model2,
> + unsigned int *cpu_features2)
> {
> const char *cpu = NULL;
> unsigned int family = cpu_model2->__cpu_family;
> @@ -1016,6 +1016,10 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
> extended_model = (eax >> 12) & 0xf0;
> extended_family = (eax >> 20) & 0xff;
>
> + /* Find available features. */
> + get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
> + ecx, edx);
> +
> if (vendor == signature_INTEL_ebx)
> {
> /* Adjust model and family for Intel CPUS. */
> @@ -1030,9 +1034,6 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
> cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
> cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
>
> - /* Find available features. */
> - get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
> - ecx, edx);
> /* Get CPU type. */
> get_intel_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
> cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_INTEL;
> @@ -1049,9 +1050,6 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
> cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
> cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
>
> - /* Find available features. */
> - get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
> - ecx, edx);
> /* Get CPU type. */
> get_amd_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
> cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_AMD;
> @@ -1059,22 +1057,17 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
> else if (vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx && family < 0x07)
> cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_CENTAUR;
> else if (vendor == signature_SHANGHAI_ebx
> - || vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx)
> + || vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx)
> {
> /* Adjust model and family for ZHAOXIN CPUS. */
> if (family == 0x07)
> - {
> - model += extended_model;
> - }
> + model += extended_model;
>
> cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
> cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
>
> - /* Find available features. */
> - get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
> - ecx, edx);
> /* Get CPU type. */
> - get_zhaoxin_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2,cpu_features2);
> + get_zhaoxin_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
> cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_ZHAOXIN;
> }
> else if (vendor == signature_CYRIX_ebx)
>
> Jakub
>
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 12:11 Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-09 15:30 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2023-02-09 15:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-09 16:34 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMe9rOoFo6uY5qEbdpJ+PRu+F7Wk65=E-COctRS0mUmPhv=Lsw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).