On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: >> On 07/17/2015 07:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: >>>> The following code (reduced from wide-int.h) is rejected by Intel C++ >>>> Compiler (EDG-based): >>> >>> So, could you test this with the top of the tree compiler and file a bug >>> report against g++ for it, if it seems to not work right. If that bug report >>> is rejected, then I’d say file a bug report against clang and EDG. >> >> In addition to usual bootstrap+regtest, I also checked that build succeeds with >> GCC 4.3.6 (IIRC, this is now the minimal required version) as well as with >> recent GCC snapshot used as stage 0. Committed as r225993. >> I also filed this bugreport: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66941 >> >>>> I think that the warning is correct, and "template <>" should not be used >>>> here. The attached patch should fix this issue. Bootstrapped and regtested >>>> on x86_64-linux. OK for trunk? >>> >>> Ok. Does this need to go into the gcc-5 release branch as well? If so, ok >>> there too. Thanks. >> I think there is no need for it. > > It is also need for gcc-5. I am backporting it now. > This is what I checked into gcc-5-branch. -- H.J.