public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>,
	Hongtao Liu <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: PING^1 [PATCH v2] x86: Check AVX512 without mask instructions
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 05:27:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOowsmRMjzmg706Q4wQjvApphscFoCQObkVKk4jYDfEbsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrQjcYbqY-rtnWszpca=LT2gdXm8ao_d5HqtvrRsXOqnA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:39 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:50 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:51 AM Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:13 AM Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
> > > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:12 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > CPUID functions are used to detect CPU features.  If vector ISAs
> > > > > are enabled, compiler is free to use them in these functions.  Add
> > > > > __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) to CPUID functions
> > > > > to avoid vector instructions.
> > > >
> > > > These functions are intended to be inlined, so how does target
> > > > attribute affect inlining?
> > > I guess w/ -O0. they may not be inlined, that's why H.J adds those
> > > attributes to those functions.
> >
> > The problem is not with these functions, but with surrounding checks
> > for cpuid features. These checks are implemented with logic
> > instructions, and nothing prevents RA from allocating mask registers,
> > and consequently mask insn is emitted. Regarding mentioned functions,
> > cpuid insn pattern has four GPR single-reg constraints, so mask
> > registers can't be allocated here.
> >
> > > pr96814.dump:
> > > 0804aa40 <main>:
> > >  804aa40: 8d 4c 24 04          lea    0x4(%esp),%ecx
> > > ...
> > >  804aa63: 6a 07                push   $0x7
> > >  804aa65: e8 e0 e7 ff ff        call   804924a <__get_cpuid_count>
> > >
> > > Also we need to add a target attribute to avx512f_os_support (), and
> > > that would be enough to fix the AVX512 part.
> > >
> > > Moreover, all check functions in below files may also need to deal with:
> > > adx-check.h
> > > aes-avx-check.h
> > > aes-check.h
> > > amx-check.h
> > > attr-nocf-check-1a.c
> > > attr-nocf-check-3a.c
> > > avx2-check.h
> > > avx2-vpop-check.h
> > > avx512bw-check.h
> > > avx512-check.h
> > > avx512dq-check.h
> > > avx512er-check.h
> > > avx512f-check.h
> > > avx512vl-check.h
> > > avx-check.h
> > > bmi2-check.h
> > > bmi-check.h
> > > cf_check-1.c
> > > cf_check-2.c
> > > cf_check-3.c
> > > cf_check-4.c
> > > cf_check-5.c
> > > f16c-check.h
> > > fma4-check.h
> > > fma-check.h
> > > isa-check.h
> > > lzcnt-check.h
> > > m128-check.h
> > > m256-check.h
> > > m512-check.h
> > > mmx-3dnow-check.h
> > > mmx-check.h
> > > pclmul-avx-check.h
> > > pclmul-check.h
> > > pr39315-check.c
> > > rtm-check.h
> > > sha-check.h
> > > spellcheck-options-1.c
> > > spellcheck-options-2.c
> > > spellcheck-options-3.c
> > > spellcheck-options-4.c
> > > spellcheck-options-5.c
> > > sse2-check.h
> > > sse3-check.h
> > > sse4_1-check.h
> > > sse4_2-check.h
> > > sse4a-check.h
> > > sse-check.h
> > > ssse3-check.h
> > > stack-check-11.c
> > > stack-check-12.c
> > > stack-check-17.c
> > > stack-check-18.c
> > > stack-check-19.c
> > > xop-check.h
> >
> > True, but this would just paper over the real problem. Now, it is
> > expected that the user decorates the function that checks CPUID
> > features with the target attribute. I'm not sure if this is OK.
> >
> > Uros.
>
> CPUID functions are used to detect CPU features.  If mask instructions
> are enabled, compiler is free to use them in these functions.  Disable
> AVX512F in AVX512 check with target pragma to avoid mask instructions.
>
> OK for master?
>

PING:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573717.html


-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24 12:12 [PATCH] x86: Compile CPUID functions with -mgeneral-regs-only H.J. Lu
2021-06-24 12:35 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-24 12:41   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-24 12:47     ` Richard Biener
2021-06-24 13:00       ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-24 16:12 ` Uros Bizjak
2021-06-24 18:00   ` H.J. Lu
2021-06-25  2:56   ` Hongtao Liu
2021-06-25  7:49     ` Uros Bizjak
2021-06-25 12:39       ` [PATCH v2] x86: Check AVX512 without mask instructions H.J. Lu
2021-07-14 12:27         ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-07-26  3:33           ` PING^1 " Hongtao Liu
2021-07-30 10:02             ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOowsmRMjzmg706Q4wQjvApphscFoCQObkVKk4jYDfEbsA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=crazylht@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).