public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
		Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
		David Li <davidxl@google.com>,
	Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Optimize access to globals in "-fpie -pie" builds with copy relocations
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpAnkfsJMXMM=MGNfqsCsLeBdNwmyCqLk6FbbrULbKigQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqyFr_dUHCNccrYDPP8_Xq=4=TfLe-24_nLxigUQy0K1A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1859 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:10 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On February 4, 2015 11:37:01 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:57 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sriraman Tallam
>>><tmsriram@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:45 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:38:48AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Common symbol should be resolved locally for PIE.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> binds_local_p yes, binds_to_current_def_p no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P set to binds_local_p or
>>>>>>> binds_to_current_def_p?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like binds_local_p:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> varasm.c:
>>>>>> void
>>>>>> default_encode_section_info (tree decl, rtx rtl, int first
>>>ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>   ...
>>>>>>   if (targetm.binds_local_p (decl))
>>>>>>     flags |= SYMBOL_FLAG_LOCAL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P false?
>>>>
>>>> In varasm.c, default_binds_local_p_1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  /* Default visibility weak data can be overridden by a strong symbol
>>>>      in another module and so are not local.  */
>>>>   else if (DECL_WEAK (exp)
>>>>   && !resolved_locally)
>>>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>Why is resolved_locally false? It should be true for common
>>>symbol when compiling for PIE.
>>>
>>>>     local_p = false;
>>>>
>>>> For weak definition, it is set to false here.
>>
>> Yea and i think this is still wrong and known as
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32219
>>
>

I am testing this patch.



-- 
H.J.

[-- Attachment #2: pr32219.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1605 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
index eb65b1f..36fd393 100644
--- a/gcc/varasm.c
+++ b/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -6826,11 +6826,17 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp, int shlib)
       && (TREE_STATIC (exp) || DECL_EXTERNAL (exp)))
     {
       varpool_node *vnode = varpool_node::get (exp);
-      if (vnode && (resolution_local_p (vnode->resolution) || vnode->in_other_partition))
-	resolved_locally = true;
-      if (vnode
-	  && resolution_to_local_definition_p (vnode->resolution))
-	resolved_to_local_def = true;
+      /* If not building shared library, common or initialized symbols
+	 are also resolved locally, regardless they are weak or not.  */
+      if (vnode)
+	{
+	  if ((!shlib && vnode->definition)
+	      || vnode->in_other_partition
+	      || resolution_local_p (vnode->resolution))
+	    resolved_locally = true;
+	  if (resolution_to_local_definition_p (vnode->resolution))
+	    resolved_to_local_def = true;
+	}
     }
   else if (TREE_CODE (exp) == FUNCTION_DECL && TREE_PUBLIC (exp))
     {
@@ -6880,13 +6886,6 @@ default_binds_local_p_1 (const_tree exp, int shlib)
      symbols resolved from other modules.  */
   else if (shlib)
     local_p = false;
-  /* Uninitialized COMMON variable may be unified with symbols
-     resolved from other modules.  */
-  else if (DECL_COMMON (exp)
-	   && !resolved_locally
-	   && (DECL_INITIAL (exp) == NULL
-	       || (!in_lto_p && DECL_INITIAL (exp) == error_mark_node)))
-    local_p = false;
   /* Otherwise we're left with initialized (or non-common) global data
      which is of necessity defined locally.  */
   else

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-02 19:19 Uros Bizjak
2014-12-02 19:39 ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-02 19:40 ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-02 20:01   ` Uros Bizjak
2014-12-02 20:43     ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-02 20:19       ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-02 22:14         ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-02 23:21           ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-03 13:47     ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-03 15:01       ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-03 21:35         ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-04 12:44           ` Uros Bizjak
2014-12-04 16:46             ` H.J. Lu
2014-12-04 19:32               ` Uros Bizjak
2015-02-03 19:25               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-03 19:26                 ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-03 19:36                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-03 21:20                   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-03 21:29                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-03 21:36                       ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-03 22:03                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-03 22:19                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-04  1:16                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 18:27                               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-04 18:31                                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-04 18:38                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 18:42                                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-04 18:45                                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 18:51                                         ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-04 18:57                                           ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 21:53                                             ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-04 22:37                                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 22:47                                                 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-02-04 23:10                                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-04 23:29                                                     ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2015-02-05 16:57                                                       ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-02-05 18:54                                                       ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-05 19:01                                                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-05 19:59                                                           ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-05 22:05                                                             ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-05 22:47                                                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-05 22:48                                                                 ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-02-06 16:25                                                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-27 23:39               ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-27 23:46                 ` H.J. Lu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-04 22:19 Dominique Dhumieres
2014-12-04 23:54 ` H.J. Lu
2014-05-15 18:34 Sriraman Tallam
2014-05-19 18:11 ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-06-09 22:55   ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-06-21  0:17     ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-06-26 17:55       ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-07-11 17:42         ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-09-02 18:15           ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-09-02 20:40       ` Richard Henderson
2014-09-03  7:25         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2014-09-08 22:19         ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-09-19 21:11           ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-09-29 17:57             ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-10-06 20:43               ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-11-10 23:35                 ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-12-02 18:01                   ` Sriraman Tallam
2014-12-02 19:06           ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOpAnkfsJMXMM=MGNfqsCsLeBdNwmyCqLk6FbbrULbKigQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=ccoutant@google.com \
    --cc=davidxl@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=tmsriram@google.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).