From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E25C3858402 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:01:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2E25C3858402 Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id u11so8647163plf.3 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5sT4cFvrQXptIQ3QY+4qlxgJ4aJe+uzWs3c9Hzuuo+E=; b=uv5MsVaoU2w5IilcjUpMc2TQgRorcg82qwosunsqH2Pg7/zClHHJ2hJ1l2Ys+31Cfs drhlXU1RMTTeWMArOu7kL4WgDEfXuiVdVpAXr1qfpgKcllU0FMLc3usJb6vMlpecFROu UZvxHK2vEWcPkEvx+37AVc5ed0z2HQuLBot1XAZkSKLnPkz8X59zfreU/zkGTtF1sVM0 O6nEnrtSW9VvKtgFbDZvg8ad2vJJ2VswbTuN4zczTZYo/lzMUb6EDjpenc/mdeO508vJ ZZrSx9MW+V+Rg2IcBmDm2KzjGbgrqAwkBh/6MDA7ZyLpAXeJGEdMaRN5ioY0EaJ5WdYb PTgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530a28Wa3H4wAzo61tCE8bs6yaFo25dRsuLYZu2afr2u8fnA0FPu D5/LvSAVauhok2VfyY87kuokSEjcvFbm36Mj5UQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC+8af/fKxUFQnJjd6DTdy+xtdNpZaFl10JfRAG/tPI7PGA7mBUOthccHmiMxVuw+NGplWStuFbGhxdFtC6mQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:904b:b0:143:73ff:eb7d with SMTP id w11-20020a170902904b00b0014373ffeb7dmr8401178plz.85.1636729273252; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:01:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> <9e53e7e4-3268-7970-c4e7-dacb808e05e2@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <9e53e7e4-3268-7970-c4e7-dacb808e05e2@suse.cz> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:00:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: Hongtao Liu , Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3022.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:01:15 -0000 On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:44 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 11/12/21 15:41, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrot= e: > >> > >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > >>>>> This fixes issue reported in the PR. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ready to be installed? > >>>> I'm not sure. liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right > >>>> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothi= ng > >>>> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed awa= y > >>>> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix = it in > >>>> their source and update from that. > >>>> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream. > >>> I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the ca= se that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code. > >>> > >>> jeff > >> > >> @H.J. ? > >> > > > > We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12. We will remove all trace= s of > > MIC offload in GCC 13. > > I see. So do you want the patch to be installed or not? > I prefer to leave it alone and close the PR with WONTFIX. --=20 H.J.