From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382D83861970 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:36:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 382D83861970 Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id lw7-20020a17090b1807b029017881cc80b7so16400682pjb.3 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JGgsE/ahjx5iwsk79g/Yqlbr+POkI9AV/60sIjhFfZ0=; b=lfaKsIZLIMLAkgQfaGbHWDmNmPtZwwxFHBWI8FVnLleScvjTM1ZxSIskZ784e7/Vc1 RojTojyf3zlw4UUd0z06BlM6ELRATMxpFbhHFvVoJXOHpUBi3Kl3rwDKD449YdelSTgV jc/kRp6uhKILvRviRD3OeO36roA0TuJ7rIDpbVnbsqm61WZslqBGYrvqDeObNSFJcFLy eQqaneUkbdb+f0JfsxLCeZuLj5EbjIBLgZBnnjDu25yfFNKJrCmwXZoYXmenQePi1tme 0dE3ByAyIV1f0hc73tkLfJRtVfijEcJRdeFaNQ8PfzllApLgAwUJYbEfMIZXCMNgUmOb mWbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JDpTJih0OiqrYjDNO3X8GDtAUIbElUWmFjo5/djFvq2XNNmlH axOki489ReiJT99MpMHiExLwaDPY+0MgW4x2jGo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyB+Qe3gKXUG9ThSUsTHpHsZTvMIeDZSLNZjEYcgBHqfzw33JSMJG6W/KFR/gOAvWFml08iZIu7sdCbk/OF4cY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1ce:b029:12d:5a35:f4f6 with SMTP id e14-20020a17090301ceb029012d5a35f4f6mr4454726plh.4.1628789783075; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <09e4b2bd-2055-f0f8-e339-b1aeeff5176a@suse.cz> <18b1cf5b-a80c-fc00-e638-2f5b5d4136a9@suse.cz> <23b15820-f0c1-3e5e-c740-d6fdb6f3dfff@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <23b15820-f0c1-3e5e-c740-d6fdb6f3dfff@suse.cz> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:35:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: support micro-levels in target{, _clone} attrs [PR101696] To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3025.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:36:25 -0000 On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:31 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 8/12/21 5:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Will it hurt if they have proper feature_priorities you added? > > No. They are unused, by we should use the proper priorities. > > Martin + const char *arch_name =3D attrs_str + strlen ("arch=3D"); + if (startswith (arch_name, "x86-64")) + { + arg_str =3D arch_name; + builtin_fn =3D IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_SUPPORTS; + if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64") =3D=3D 0) + priority =3D P_X86_64_BASELINE; + else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v2") =3D=3D 0) + priority =3D P_X86_64_V2; + else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v3") =3D=3D 0) + priority =3D P_X86_64_V3; + else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v4") =3D=3D 0) + priority =3D P_X86_64_V4; What happens for arch=3Dx86-64-v5? + } --=20 H.J.