From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpcte-DEWeZ5QzUbXgTVTWkQ70rzOo+BB3r065=NXB-tA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4bsXQKeoBUfgM04vH_1LsDe+NPJLLJDMh5AQWcE7Zo80Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 05/13/2017 11:52 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ping? I have posted revisions of the following in patch set:
>>>>
>>>> 05/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01442.html
>>>> 09/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00348.html
>>>> 11/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00350.html
>>>>
>>>> I have retested them on Linux x86-64 in addition a Wine testsuite
>>>> comparison
>>>> resulting in fewer failed tests (31) than when using unpatched 7.1.0 (78)
>>>> and 5.4.0 (78). A cursory examination of the now working failures with
>>>> 7.1.0 seemed to be to be due to race conditions in Wine that are
>>>> incidentally hidden after the patches.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything else needed before we can commit these? They still
>>>> rebase
>>>> cleanly onto the HEAD, but I can repost as "v5" if you prefer.
>>>
>>> Please go ahead and commit the patches.
>>>
>>> However, please stay around to fix possible fallout. As said - you are
>>> touching quite complex part of the compiler ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Uros.
>>
>>
>> Thanks! I'll definitely be around, I have a lot more that I'm working on
>> with C generics/pseudo-templates (all middle-end stuff). I also want to
>> examine more ways that SSE saves/restores can be omitted in these ms to sysv
>> calls through static analysis and such.
>>
>> Anyway, I don't yet have SVN write access, will you sponsor my request?
>
> The patchset was committed to mainline SVN as r248029.
>
> Uros.
This patch caused:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 8:05 Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] [i386] Add ms2sysv pro/epilogue stubs to libgcc Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout for -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] [i386] Re-align stack frame prior to SSE saves Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] [i386,testsuite] Test program for ms to sysv abi function calls Daniel Santos
2017-05-17 9:52 ` Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] [i386] Add remainder of -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues implementation Daniel Santos
2017-05-04 22:11 ` [PATCH 11/12 rev1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] [i386] Add patterns and predicates foutline-msabi-xlouges Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:18 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 22:19 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 6:17 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-03 7:38 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 8:38 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 09/12 rev1] [i386] Add patterns and predicates mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] [i386] Use re-aligned stack pointer for aligned SSE movs Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] [i386] Add option -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-28 6:00 ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-04-28 7:37 ` [PATCH 05/12 rev 1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] [i386] Keep stack pointer valid after after re-alignment Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:23 ` [PATCH 04/12] [i386] Minor refactoring Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] [i386] Modify ix86_save_reg to optionally omit stub-managed registers Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] [i386] Add class xlogue_layout and new fields to struct machine_function Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 18:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/12 GCC8] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/12] " Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 10:25 ` JonY
2017-05-02 10:45 ` Kai Tietz
2017-05-03 6:01 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-05 9:05 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-06 20:41 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-08 20:07 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 4:32 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 0:01 ` [PING] " Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 18:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-13 23:43 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-14 10:25 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-26 19:03 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2017-07-27 0:36 ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 13:51 ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 14:41 ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-31 10:25 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMe9rOpcte-DEWeZ5QzUbXgTVTWkQ70rzOo+BB3r065=NXB-tA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).