From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-399373-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 62800 invoked by alias); 29 May 2015 17:25:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62789 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2015 17:25:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f49.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f49.google.com) (209.85.218.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 29 May 2015 17:25:55 +0000
Received: by oiww2 with SMTP id w2so61639964oiw.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.158.138 with SMTP id wu10mr7993003obb.12.1432920353493; Fri, 29 May 2015 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.160.68 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAs8Hmx-tRTazO7F1o0rwaCQT1GURTvxm0bCfGBzwgYVmap5sA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMe9rOpF996wsqCjCUtApvSh8tNcf--=+OnfnNuSyKm0VPoUKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8HmwWSDY+KjKcB4W=TiYV0Pz7NSvfL_8igp+hPT-LU1utTg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8Hmz4XpJn2vVUYd8gXS9Frq-TtSNqKUFkRWbCFi84ArBQDA@mail.gmail.com>	<555E5376.3060706@redhat.com>	<CAAs8HmzWhfkHUvvCFiBFi34S1rYK_YqrJpPcJSWasz1-53vOJw@mail.gmail.com>	<555EF018.2050309@redhat.com>	<CAAs8HmyOTKem4Sg4qM7Eon+uFO0wyCN_-cU24zSzb9TuLL7-+A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOrCh++A=jLOcDVXGM+UOyn31kuJ+R5ZmZkw8E_eHmCTHQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8Hmyd1+8k2t=4OD+FHRiomcfg-S_s_nA71+95--pw9L73Lg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpcWnZv7yqyG6TeL_RtDochw6_ar_=7RKoAqv1ZzkTwLA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8Hmy0ymq=396N9i5=Z6u8B4+9d5u07nk=D14MwJMXNxCuCA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpsMtTL-muZpND3DiS60bLXsCVgeTW6sF4a0DHmNE83+g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8HmzRQ2PtOXyV3_5XBr2ASPqZUnnDj4xEX8OqhuPB3L4HxA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOog3XBDjP9FAiLFCP7A-ir9LxBWmpcyG07+-h9hp7EjNQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8HmzkXkP261DGZiBGpwobSDaeBHZ-oosz_k3OXD4ycjGVJA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOqVHuFbddkdKrkn1zaA9ASvT76sTn3enKcYo6K_4_Z77Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8HmzRztBefZKx7KoB2LwvVWydRXDDdrw5FnexcphvXPR7gQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAs8Hmx-tRTazO7F1o0rwaCQT1GURTvxm0bCfGBzwgYVmap5sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpvM6Lv+79OJwALgvjWfaCMy7uqoH2uE_r=7RRz-42o9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][X86_64] Eliminate PLT stubs for specified external functions via -fno-plt=
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, David Li <davidxl@google.com>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02811.txt.bz2

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote:
> Hi HJ,
>
> Is this ok to commit?
>

Looks good to me.  But I can't approve it.

-- 
H.J.