From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22995 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 16:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22985 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 16:34:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f44.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f44.google.com) (209.85.218.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 16:34:21 +0000 Received: by oiko83 with SMTP id o83so10491422oik.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.55.36 with SMTP id o4mr12848327oep.0.1431448459302; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.54.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <34590F66-7C07-4ED1-B74B-A751224E851F@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: My patch for GCC 5 directory names From: "H.J. Lu" To: Richard Biener Cc: Richard Biener , Michael Matz , GCC Patches , Jakub Jelinek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01123.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote: >>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" >>wrote: >>>>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >> So we have >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> experimental >>>>>> >> release >>>>>> >> post-release >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a >>>>one-line >>>>>> >> change. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Why print anything at all? 5.1.1 is after 5.1.0 in obvious >>ways. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> How can you tell GCC 5.1.1 on May 1, 2015 from GCC 5.1.1 >>>>>> on May 12, 2015? >>>>> >>>>> Via the svn revision. But as the subject says, this patch is not >>so >>>>much >>>> >>>>So? Doesn't post-release display the svn revision.for gcc -v, which >>>>gcc -v doesn't display today? Something like this >>>> >>>>diff --git a/gcc/DEV-PHASE b/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>>>index e69de29..ee176f8 100644 >>>>--- a/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>>>+++ b/gcc/DEV-PHASE >>>>@@ -0,0 +1 @@ >>>>+post-release >>> >>> Printing post-release doesn't add any information. I believe Jakub >>fixed the missing svn revision printing already. >>> >> >>What is the real benefit of your patch? > > It keeps an unchanging directory structure for the whole GCC 5 series (also requested by customers in the past). I've been asked to post the patch I am using for this. Previous discussion concluded that we want a configury to control this. Why do we have to change directory structure on GCC 5 branch? Is there a GCC bug for this request? -- H.J.