From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-459269-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 89813 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2017 14:41:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89785 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2017 14:41:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:209.85.218.65, Hx-spam-relays-external:209.85.218.65
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f65.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f65.google.com) (209.85.218.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:41:03 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f65.google.com with SMTP id v11so18916958oif.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=uTyAh5n8x4qLMStaYY++RE/VoyB2wYHOK4Lv17w++JE=;        b=SdSSjSMjHzTosf63emc5FS49seHeKZoeMSOusU+MNoZCC0z0DVr26WWbvFKNzWbnWf         Y9FRQsXCaabJ8UQa8KXqSwztClH72YwMwRcpS1Qr9LA20ya0FnNq8w7ZE18aUZflS1/b         OhjKEtt+W7FIUawec+f3fbei6XSLiwM28mDNASWxSmHO1fLb+uy+nMo5tHpGy9FZtbS8         YuhIFSl2fjRBA4Etub5fYVgwjQZM2Vu/KywsEyTRcv9lAsZQ+1HS9nnukZsUUILg/fK7         URSYm+QqA/6xBFl6DE2rDuiAhyHGEr4Jvp43Bz6lVvhbR8AMIlAi5DNviG8ymH1Yr2Fa         4+Pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110AN5/XaFFwWpQ2VmHQewIDd+aJ6TdnDcqWOExq2miIpCXA5f0u	9F/kOebd/FRXp146tc51i9ucveTGeQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.242.213 with SMTP id q204mr7637472oih.88.1501252861934; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.169.200 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <27aa9300-78a6-f1c3-d025-aa43fdcbc6a3@pobox.com>
References: <49e81c0b-07a4-22df-d7c3-2439177ac7cf@pobox.com> <08ca9667-0844-13a9-890b-a2c7092e060a@pobox.com> <CAFULd4bFuNx6hJAEcn1zz30yCaDV6Xn_Z2ssJ2TsA3Su4hcJ0A@mail.gmail.com> <62ed3cf1-bc4d-a989-4423-e47017d255e4@pobox.com> <CAFULd4bsXQKeoBUfgM04vH_1LsDe+NPJLLJDMh5AQWcE7Zo80Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOpcte-DEWeZ5QzUbXgTVTWkQ70rzOo+BB3r065=NXB-tA@mail.gmail.com> <27aa9300-78a6-f1c3-d025-aa43fdcbc6a3@pobox.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqaMZNOcwtQ=0yyoBFkMAqwL_Mq7sh75bB8ys4YExZjvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg01918.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 02:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> This patch caused:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
>
>
> Hello.  I've rebased my patch set and I'm now retesting.  I'm afraid that
> your changes are wrong because my my sp_valid_at and fp_valid_at functions
> are wrong -- these are supposed to be for the base offset and not the CFA
> offset, sorry about that.  This means that the check in choose_basereg (and
> thus choose_baseaddr) have been wrong as well.  I'm retesting now.

Please check your change with gcc.target/i386/pr81563.c.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.