From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6DA3858402 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:42:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5A6DA3858402 Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id u17so8532459plg.9 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:42:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BIVvFISK3iRS7EjLYzHlbxWZ39kQpNFSq64Ehe7Gr2E=; b=TFTIHe4ydIXp2/OD3R1Vi+rL4fNvNMTRhGeBaWyBltCSCzEQ1PtwfbSWq5AmSRDr91 R7uyzep7rhjPef+ghEX6S9a5M79FtmXmn47G0rwobQE9GpRh7saQgt8te56lZ2005F4h XNTt3ex4g/IPDfa3Vdl7C76lpvwx9Kbnc9QZ0uYw9A+AVBow8vPX6FRMi1C3SH7deLDK iA9J8ynjo1Je4npsXh7oh5pYjmFm467uz/SuaSEK+OGybpLA7DjRe/i7g2WOI+G4qJvL zo1M1gmYaDhdW50hveTdSYS87IDKlh8Z2MALkQCPioHLAwkpg/ZGqPJjnVUuT9RAcy12 7MCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306GegcQQQXcmBDGAv6QDDGu66fTOKV12oORLfn/aAxFQzLpzRT ljUU5cYLA56BtfkOdMEz0IJ7g1l/B1cEqw3yyQE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymi1XPe1DJFv0M890hO5q71Fm0+aCozyUbH4kbtWiayzhr7qaCLdUERyhhNPIhGodbuFPoj9rdmtPsYImk+Vo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0e:: with SMTP id pg14mr36130456pjb.143.1636728137308; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:42:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:41:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Hongtao Liu Cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3023.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:42:19 -0000 On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > > On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > >>> This fixes issue reported in the PR. > >>> > >>> Ready to be installed? > >> I'm not sure. liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right > >> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothing > >> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed away > >> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix it= in > >> their source and update from that. > >> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream. > > I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the case= that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code. > > > > jeff > > @H.J. ? > We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12. We will remove all traces of MIC offload in GCC 13. --=20 H.J.