From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-297518-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8579 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2011 15:42:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 8568 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2011 15:42:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:42:13 +0000
Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so823472qwh.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.86.72 with SMTP id r8mr366878qcl.84.1311262932371; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.98.193 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrKsBgmGdHkW2QADiFzeGQ5ZnG9MaTOpkHEy0iRjT_uqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEwic4YMRruZLRfCJTGeso1urp_Nq_Ya=G0TSG+8-DYjgYD0gQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc1-6o4FKHdn_Go+SQOtu-gFi0ttsBBqX+bM_03G9Xao9w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4bHnrjs7AdXtB_=o8afU0VgQozz=T9vexRSen5y8t6ngw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc1RFHoUPkPWrkGrAKMdBqVN_-dYaNCYhgWJgO+Z3-0q7g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4aJcEw-KzR1kvc5syQ9EXvUjKmqaUHfTgOAfLjhi-WPsA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc3eMq+1xOyDYEAjJ2H36kabdmYZ5sZr6bsjg3HS=5raUA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4a0UHngrQVB9ENMuy=kRfTuYcyxSi+Wdy_dm3Tfsom4=A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc3PA=mst8+HkdvASJO=xhuL7tjp5VtvVeSCO+DFH_1Zew@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4YPL8XiOadyrqZL99y25zUnpqDU3Umdn5p4QY8+=pL=BA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0WN4L_PVe29-7_HuW9fY-DKDnPyM=XOvuBjJe85zEmvw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4YsdWVij2AzJ4kUzNQhwEQ8NqBtoOU=gp2SWMoHzCa_jg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc30z+fx3y7qd+S1L8e7WGRf0CPVwqX2bwRDwLnPsu0yAw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4bEUMrvW7QtwtPnLpMN4Qxy1Ut7ion14o66aNNHuzji4g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4Yk8s+3EftSQR4T0=jbo68+muEnp4ViheH=86OKDwN4BA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc1F27ztjOEGi651vvR=mpVBRdAq94utFs5nOV-DPUM0Rg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4ZyD2nU_RvDyMPyMbzzb1nb-Qqe1U7KQCqi8=6rOzq9XA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc3i9FAuujMUJQAeeUsMS7hooCVZqSxXPH=0nixraFDKtg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4YyLz0uO2o2F+uEdcCdZjF9nRc81Q_rR34c5YTApVFoDg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4YCEU2SThEY_=x7oKYio42vQikHKetvGfnvaSoynrT74g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0GWKyM6azXz+Th5zvmcGjUHYFyg6N988kQBkJJ1jiWiQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4ZMhjbvs6ghZb7Fnowc1kNA+FGY3eKs2Jamn=0CsXJSSw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOrKsBgmGdHkW2QADiFzeGQ5ZnG9MaTOpkHEy0iRjT_uqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqj51Ca7ZgdrbLM8Q8HpjoKy63N8T5ahQcuV+1mLYN5Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch tree-optimization]: [2 of 3]: Boolify compares & more
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01787.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/7/21 Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
>>> With these two changes the patch is ok to commit (it will also
>>> regress gcc.target/i386/andor-2.c but that is an exact duplicate
>>> of the already regressed gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, retested with your comments and applied at rev 176563.
>>
>
> This caused:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49805
>

This also caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49806

-- 
H.J.