From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-386389-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26758 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2014 22:14:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26744 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2014 22:14:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f43.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f43.google.com) (209.85.218.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 22:14:40 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a3so9974608oib.30        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:14:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.22.234 with SMTP id h10mr1130684obf.22.1417558478715; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:14:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.185.7 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:14:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141202201929.GN1860@tucnak.redhat.com>
References: <CAFULd4aMopCHZHTWa3V=6-CwVLq1grorwRqT7yCaOfpLWYZibw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOok=sUB=OVdFNt369gkpNWxVgzQKjeDVQT96SrSNRS=Vw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4Z=WaenYMr=Ke1QLQAq4bVQpkOD_Wt3nW4w9F71fuaPAw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOq1iw9NPfWeXa9F2xqBr7zGAXHNFN7Lgd3zmX3pLZZSYQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20141202201929.GN1860@tucnak.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 22:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqrcu_JdzA3hKNHjEV3Vyt9wJ3dXb6JXfPWmiVqpMMzsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86_64] Optimize access to globals in "-fpie -pie" builds with copy relocations
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:16:09PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > IMO, nobody will use this highly special x86_64-only option. It would
>> > be best for gnu-ld to reach feature parity with gold as far as this
>> > functionality is concerned. In this case, the optimization would be
>> > auto-configured, and would fire automatically, without any user
>> > intervention.
>>
>> I will implement it in ld after its support is checked into GCC.
>
> I think it would be better to do it the other way around, so that gcc can be
> configured against the right ld from the start.
>

Consider it is done.  I will check it into binutils ths week.


-- 
H.J.