From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E2C3858426 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 11:22:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 19E2C3858426 Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id b4so9842156pgh.10 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 04:22:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UX66RkrOFwactv1UtpXJIQVrv+npphSm/mBnOU6LywQ=; b=Ra/+3crRrmulU6vKqKg1V/J33fLOxQj9MQcwZBvTilYEcY5zLSA2a5ylk8JCi0zgU1 It/uHZtS1P5Y4dD+d7pxckNWD5xgZY9fLx5EVgKp6JQ5LRkNbSRtYeESYSO0s3Ie80WC EsVZWPhzqd0f3urpcWMzPgmmz3w3LBRtXTSOcog2essBbuvj6dx7HpNxmYlPmJNzy9Ju a1IpC6zjZ8SB0tpWBchZssrr6ZIGS63ZyNkL4+sSgw+tQFlG7O/1lk2heEDNBn3pvx2C LgGpnoO3YfykjY2LU89k2POug8aw8LvsHjUXcebyDz859rz4Xj5/rdbtCOHChN1rhaB1 0T8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oUVFHZuRF1p8qO58+xreb0ijAiUSCYq4HvOOKYiaNEBeD+NGM jvwRXwnehiKGsygt31ntLNp4OA2JPRz21Kn6E/cmg4Du X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwT9NByanECOS3tSzRWFOBf0wsTmcwoOJtRMFedoXfOAT6uR+i2elfHCaRctWEZI5yQ80V0RqPqise195bv4L4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b4c:b0:481:2a:f374 with SMTP id p12-20020a056a000b4c00b00481002af374mr8087059pfo.60.1635765729981; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 04:22:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211021164722.500302-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 04:21:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Document -fcf-protection requires i686 or newer To: Eric Gallager Cc: gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3029.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 11:22:12 -0000 On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:04 PM Eric Gallager wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:49 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > PR target/98667 > > * doc/invoke.texi: Document -fcf-protection requires i686 or > > new. > > --- > > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > index c66a25fcd69..71992b8c597 100644 > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > @@ -15542,7 +15542,8 @@ which functions and calls should be skipped from instrumentation > > (@pxref{Function Attributes}). > > > > Currently the x86 GNU/Linux target provides an implementation based > > -on Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET). > > +on Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) which works for > > +i686 processor or newer. > > I think "processor" should be pluralized to "processors"? Also, > possibly a missing comma after "(CET)"? > Can you submit a patch? Thanks. -- H.J.