From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5148 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2011 13:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 5140 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2011 13:44:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:44:32 +0000 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so3179655qwh.20 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:44:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.114.82 with SMTP id d18mr417221qcq.110.1314020671874; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.29.7 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:44:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1314006155.3533.2576.camel@triegel.csb> References: <1314006155.3533.2576.camel@triegel.csb> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [trans-mem] Use __x86_64__ instead of __LP64__. From: "H.J. Lu" To: Torvald Riegel Cc: GCC Patches , Richard Henderson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg01764.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > Use __x86_64__ instead of __LP64__ in setjmp/longjmp and TLS > definitions. > > H.J.: Is that sufficient for x32, or do we need entirely different code? > If so, can you please provide the required changes? > I need to take a look. Thanks. -- H.J.