From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-395295-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 64461 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2015 19:55:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 64429 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2015 19:55:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f51.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f51.google.com) (209.85.218.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:55:49 +0000
Received: by oiko83 with SMTP id o83so55362191oik.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.208.1 with SMTP id h1mr21266282oig.74.1429214147936; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.54.14 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOp_k+eGvZR1OxjZqsR2vpJoRg_bTmy4FtN6N7d_Lz1AMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1502251425360.28824@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<CAMe9rOp_k+eGvZR1OxjZqsR2vpJoRg_bTmy4FtN6N7d_Lz1AMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrJM93zO0W8+TPE7G49mhKwUGondAuFTLh8A3bu+hL5xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR65204
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00835.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:03 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> This fixes missed tracking of alignment of non-invariant addresses
>> in CCP.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, queued for GCC 6.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>> 2015-02-25  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
>>
>>         PR tree-optimization/65204
>>         * tree-ssa-ccp.c (evaluate_stmt): Always evaluate address
>>         takens for bit-CCP.
>>
>
> This caused:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65758

This also caused:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65788

and r222085 didn't fix it.

-- 
H.J.