public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/106379 - add missing ~(a ^ b) folding for _Bool
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 13:15:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrPEZ0rkP7C9BOfON9hnvpPQCT3bD6T71_Aco4gmupj2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721112338.7CEC113A1B@imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 4:24 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> The following makes sure to fold ~(a ^ b) to a == b for truth
> values (but not vectors, we'd have to check for vector support of
> equality).  That turns the PR106379 testcase into a ranger one.
>
> Note that while we arrive at ~(a ^ b) in a convoluted way from
> original !a == !b one can eventually write the expression this
> way directly as well.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
>
>         PR tree-optimization/106379
>         * match.pd (~(a ^ b) -> a == b): New pattern.
>
>         * gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c: New testcase.
> ---
>  gcc/match.pd                      | 6 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> index 8bbc0dbd5cd..88a1a5aa9cc 100644
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -1938,6 +1938,12 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>   (if (tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)))
>    (bit_not (bit_xor (view_convert @0) @1))))
>
> +/* ~(a ^ b) is a == b for truth valued a and b.  */
> +(simplify
> + (bit_not (bit_xor:s truth_valued_p@0 truth_valued_p@1))
> + (if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (type))
> +  (convert (eq @0 @1))))

For integers, isn't it wrong to convert ~(boolean exp) to boolean exp?


>  /* (x & ~m) | (y & m) -> ((x ^ y) & m) ^ x */
>  (simplify
>   (bit_ior:c (bit_and:cs @0 (bit_not @2)) (bit_and:cs @1 @2))
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..7f2575e02dc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106379-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-forwprop1" } */
> +
> +_Bool foo (_Bool a, _Bool b)
> +{
> +  return !a == !b;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "\[ab\]_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\) == \[ba\]_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\)" "forwprop1" } } */
> --
> 2.35.3



--
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 11:23 Richard Biener
2022-07-22 20:15 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2022-07-23  6:09   ` Richard Biener
2022-07-25 14:05     ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-25 14:49       ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOrPEZ0rkP7C9BOfON9hnvpPQCT3bD6T71_Aco4gmupj2A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).