From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-401839-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 130593 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 05:03:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130218 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2015 05:03:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f50.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f50.google.com) (209.85.218.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:03:06 +0000
Received: by oigx81 with SMTP id x81so47693279oig.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 22:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.55.36 with SMTP id o4mr29480391oep.0.1435813384361; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 22:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.160.68 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 22:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150618101646.GC28183@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>
References: <20150618101646.GC28183@msticlxl57.ims.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrjbHNT26LP+G1D4rvnNz9qOBMB8haV_usRNJR_jzhJ8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, CHKP, PR middle-end/66568] Fix internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently return statement with no bounds in instrumented function causes ICE.  This patch uses zero bounds in such cases instead.  Bootstrapped and regtested for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  Applied to trunk.  Is it OK for gcc-5-branch?
>

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d7bb9f6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx -O2 -fPIC" } */
> +
> +int a, b, c;
> +void *set_test () {
> +  if (b)
> +    a ? exit (0) : exit (1);
> +  b = c;
> +}

I checked in this patch to add a prototype for exit.


H.J.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog (revision 225294)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-07-01  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ * gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c (exit): New prototype.
+
 2015-07-01  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>

  * lib/target-supports.exp (cxx_default): Set to C++14.
Index: gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c (revision 225294)
+++ gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c (working copy)
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx -O2 -fPIC" } */

+extern void exit (int);
 int a, b, c;
 void *set_test () {
   if (b)


-- 
H.J.