From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-404328-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 53507 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2015 16:42:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 53498 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2015 16:42:56 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f174.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:42:55 +0000
Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so35036075obb.2        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.45.104 with SMTP id l8mr49246459oem.61.1438274573407; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.160.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <orwpzcv2a2.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc38hY5jfVx-92f1i2aZKMVynPt1YrdWCObX3T45a_2V3Q@mail.gmail.com>	<ork2u0imrg.fsf@free.home>	<CAFiYyc1FQkwXDo0pKXkLmc-pgN9zAG2_+ru0TQsVQRWgVUqR1w@mail.gmail.com>	<ory4ifhkkg.fsf@free.home>	<ora8ut3oh6.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3Dq3CycGg=YoD+eCbSBkPUHfpG-o5OhBag4Da8L3SwTQ@mail.gmail.com>	<orio9cw10j.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA@mail.gmail.com>	<orwpxqvqnp.fsf@livre.home>	<20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org>	<CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA@mail.gmail.com>	<or4mkmhgc9.fsf@livre.home>	<CAMe9rOp=S5fu1N=i7waswCYqJeLBCrySqYdFYkVa7LV04vpQSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrq+ZBAg1nZ1twEcPqwBj4j9+XA+SXQJVWWzjfdvidjtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, 	Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02589.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66978
>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
>>
>> Thanks, both of these are also fixed (I merged your patch for x32, and I
>> verified manually that another fix I just wrote fixes all the -m32
>> -msse2 regressions) in the git branch aoliva/pr64164, but I'm going to
>> investigate a few more issues affecting other targets before I start
>> full regression tests all over the build farm ;-)
>>
>
> I am building x32 on aoliva/pr64164 now.

aoliva/pr64164  is fine on x32.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.