From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A5D3858D3C
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 20:40:38 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 33A5D3858D3C
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id
 v1-20020a17090a088100b001a21156830bso3316746pjc.1
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 13:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=qhLFjAnHSKZas5pjKBVigPAe8WhSgh80o4hgwLTpKOg=;
 b=qu0hn4D/MUO6P4/qblc/SkkMq5dO7n3Sqd8EenBcDlGguwKSHJaxXQeWu7krO8fMbW
 JIVi4UC6IqfxhLPnYgL09KJfIVbl4zZfYdgK1o9rOdMejXX+STQxn9qZ5nieCgbheh6A
 4oscdub+9h/eaNxGimGoRmELT29Zq5KGPQRAd/+MItlq/Ey7f/qQB9anA2axjBjpm0rv
 WRNSWB5uaeBogN3rkgtXZ2HLaDaO9GkiJxouHMj3nJm1FADYysOS2g3v1JolbeOhFwF6
 e3RUqDle0yhixyX88u7XDpeuMfEDCAq9g8nN24BuO8sarksNtY48cQaUkeZh1nCTebws
 Sr2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533S3ueHWiZownfAG4V9d67DShVMI2dXA8A8mAUGHkNz8rr60hfr
 nA9Iu2kR9um9RI6i9JDN8oW3GC1W3MCmabXjsI0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTPv1MDq+kketKpljsF++GgxWynfiFgTdgRgELng9y2mlZ8+Gc9V2cd/7tZEPBOZnJYmnlDRU95+5ZXzHTEyY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cecf:b0:140:5397:92b7 with SMTP id
 d15-20020a170902cecf00b00140539792b7mr2453078plg.66.1635108037201; Sun, 24
 Oct 2021 13:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210902155045.2620513-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc3YWSEejvofQrkMJaNgyMVjinxLJPrQPRfgqa+NOY6KsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOrF4f909Unni4s=gQGaRy5RXAp8GVb476Z44GbN7v+3WA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc39018G7bZcW8GROsFwU4=U=EX7xD_T06+YkmvgJKv8_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOoNGX-UMF0cNfOT_r1kdAdzfVS8XOOe3of7sKcyTnTZfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOrNpBDPRLTGrYnhDBZoYaFm=G440fteuNtCahXjwgYBHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvny=P6ugU5eF=73U5eaxFLYEA8qZxymTciQLtVH6hcT86Yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOq8WJfC4at=Z4H8mmOMHdSZQogzcOkLr+YOoGWO2CcKWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvny=KD28EZRok=1oae4xcn-LOJaCchpTYecfmsD03RbpywQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOpp_=TLGm7Rg_jXWrFo372O8SHZhGhqrWZiUjjhSsPEZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvnymA=YoEPmXfVqCk5AT=B5Pix5M70fUNkWZopmB+=SDeeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOpeZ8OptEJxDF2dHSTPGDvtwJwPC+r=zixpFSv5udz1fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvnymbCsNdUp8cwSigVnYoU=ysJDMP563RqAAcmOeXijWnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOrTVwAw0Ovq0wySBMMiwZdjn9wDpQDo6-pMLoTgDXwR9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGWvny=4ZoMTLUHvooUd05rQhNswO0hspevTwD06eaZnpvJYEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOqt_koYgYvFhU2DQHJ9XSXadN1Lrj=cFUV9VoxOncZ2WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <DF9C4F4F-5218-490C-831E-45CBC6B181D9@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF9C4F4F-5218-490C-831E-45CBC6B181D9@googlemail.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 13:40:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOruZ5aOgsMeXODswp8CNn5FCSkJzGHs8tWhy=ci2zKh+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] libffi: Sync with upstream
To: Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, 
 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3024.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 20:40:39 -0000

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 1:36 PM Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi H.J.
>
> > On 19 Oct 2021, at 19:01, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:03 AM David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
>
> >> My colleague built GCC, including GCC Go, with your patch:
> >>
> >> "I was able to build libgo and test it partially.  The results are
> >> similar to the current master without libffi updates. But 64bit tests
> >> aren't working in both cases. It's related to LIBPATH issues..."
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for checking.  I will rebase and retest.  If there is no regression,
> > I will check them in.
>
> At r12-4638.
>
> It seems that there are quite a few m32 libffi fails on x86_64-linux-gnu [gcc123].
>
> It seems that all-languages bootstrap is broken on BE powerpc64-linux-gnu [gcc110]:
>
> ../../../src-patched/libffi/src/powerpc/linux64_closure.S:404: Error: unrecognized opcode: `lvx'
> make[4]: *** [src/powerpc/linux64_closure.lo] Error 1
>
> could you take a look please?

Does it fail in libffi upstream? If yes, please open an issue in libffi
upstream.  If not, why does it fail in GCC?

-- 
H.J.