From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR target/46770: Use .init_array/.fini_array sections
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOryTBagJUGPDn_1zEAhn1+7CwA_Q7w=osPNyLb6NS5rdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOo8r-Z=NrsnUky_Vte36fBDUF_tpKni4ph9wAC9a9RYjg@mail.gmail.com>
PING.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> PING.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:00 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:03 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:59:28AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -2660,6 +2664,7 @@ esac
>>>>>> case ${target} in
>>>>>> i[34567]86-*-linux* | x86_64-*-linux*)
>>>>>> tmake_file="${tmake_file} i386/t-pmm_malloc i386/t-i386"
>>>>>> + use_initfini_array=yes
>>>>>> ;;
>>>>>> i[34567]86-*-* | x86_64-*-*)
>>>>>> tmake_file="${tmake_file} i386/t-gmm_malloc i386/t-i386"
>>>>>
>>>>> What is i?86/x86_64 specific on it? Don't most other glibc targets
>>>>> want to use it too, perhaps with some arch specific tweaks?
>>>>
>>>> I do have a patch for all ELF targets:
>>>>
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01416.html
>>>>
>>>> It touches many targets. . But I only have one feedback from one
>>>> target maintainer. I don't know how long it will take to review it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/config/initfini-array.c
>>>>>
>>>>> This is ugly. varasm.c already has lots of ELF specific code, simply
>>>>> put them there as well and only let configury set some macro which will
>>>>> allow targets to choose which of the implementations in the generic code
>>>>> they want to use (or if they want their own which e.g. calls the generic
>>>>> routine and does something additional to it etc.). The sections probably
>>>>> can be created only the first time you actually need them.
>>>>
>>>> I will do that.
>>>>
>>>>>> --- a/gcc/crtstuff.c
>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/crtstuff.c
>>>>>> @@ -189,6 +190,9 @@ typedef void (*func_ptr) (void);
>>>>>> refer to only the __CTOR_END__ symbol in crtend.o and the __DTOR_LIST__
>>>>>> symbol in crtbegin.o, where they are defined. */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* No need for .ctors/.dtors section if linker can place them in
>>>>>> + .init_array/.fini_array section. */
>>>>>> +#ifndef NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS
>>>>>> /* The -1 is a flag to __do_global_[cd]tors indicating that this table
>>>>>> does not start with a count of elements. */
>>>>>> #ifdef CTOR_LIST_BEGIN
>>>>>> @@ -219,6 +223,7 @@ STATIC func_ptr __DTOR_LIST__[1]
>>>>>> __attribute__((section(".dtors"), aligned(sizeof(func_ptr))))
>>>>>> = { (func_ptr) (-1) };
>>>>>> #endif /* __DTOR_LIST__ alternatives */
>>>>>> +#endif /* NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #ifdef USE_EH_FRAME_REGISTRY
>>>>>> /* Stick a label at the beginning of the frame unwind info so we can register
>>>>>> @@ -489,6 +494,9 @@ __do_global_ctors_1(void)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #elif defined(CRT_END) /* ! CRT_BEGIN */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* No need for .ctors/.dtors section if linker can place them in
>>>>>> + .init_array/.fini_array section. */
>>>>>> +#ifndef NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS
>>>>>> /* Put a word containing zero at the end of each of our two lists of function
>>>>>> addresses. Note that the words defined here go into the .ctors and .dtors
>>>>>> sections of the crtend.o file, and since that file is always linked in
>>>>>> @@ -534,6 +542,7 @@ STATIC func_ptr __DTOR_END__[1]
>>>>>> __attribute__((used, section(".dtors"), aligned(sizeof(func_ptr))))
>>>>>> = { (func_ptr) 0 };
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> +#endif /* NO_CTORS_DTORS_SECTIONS */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #ifdef EH_FRAME_SECTION_NAME
>>>>>> /* Terminate the frame unwind info section with a 4byte 0 as a sentinel;
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see how you can do this. It would IMO break any time you link code
>>>>> built by different gcc versions where some code emitted by the older gcc
>>>>> used .ctors or .dtors.
>>>>
>>>> crtstuff.c is used to generate crt*.o, which is the part of GCC. You only use
>>>> it with the GCC you are using. Since your GCC doesn't put anything in
>>>> .ctors/.dtors section, you don't need them. As for .o files generated by
>>>> old GCCs, that is the linker test, use_initfini_array, is for. The newer linker
>>>> can put input .ctors/.dtors sections in output .init_array/,fini_array sections.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is the updated patch. Any comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> H.J.
>>> ---
>>> 2011-07-22 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>>
>>> PR target/46770
>>> * config.gcc (use_initfini_array): New variable.
>>> Use .init_arary/.fini_array if they are supported.
>>>
>>> * crtstuff.c: Don't generate .ctors nor .dtors sections if
>>> USE_INITFINI_ARRAY is defined.
>>>
>>> * output.h (default_initfini_array_init_sections): New.
>>> * varasm.c (elf_init_array_section): Likewise.
>>> (elf_fini_array_section): Likewise.
>>> (get_elf_initfini_array_priority_section): Likewise.
>>> (default_elf_init_array_asm_out_constructor): Likewise.
>>> (default_elf_fini_array_asm_out_destructor): Likewise.
>>> (default_initfini_array_init_sections): Likewise.
>>>
>>> * config/initfini-array.h: New.
>>> * config/t-initfini-array: Likewise.
>>>
>>
>> No need for config/t-initfini-array. Here is the updated patch.
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>> ----
>> 2011-07-22 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>
>> PR target/46770
>> * config.gcc (use_initfini_array): New variable.
>> Use .init_arary/.fini_array if they are supported.
>>
>> * crtstuff.c: Don't generate .ctors nor .dtors sections if
>> USE_INITFINI_ARRAY is defined.
>>
>> * output.h (default_initfini_array_init_sections): New.
>> * varasm.c (elf_init_array_section): Likewise.
>> (elf_fini_array_section): Likewise.
>> (get_elf_initfini_array_priority_section): Likewise.
>> (default_elf_init_array_asm_out_constructor): Likewise.
>> (default_elf_fini_array_asm_out_destructor): Likewise.
>> (default_initfini_array_init_sections): Likewise.
>>
>> * config/initfini-array.h: New.
>>
>> * config/arm/arm.c (arm_asm_init_sections): Call
>> default_initfini_array_init_sections.
>> * config/avr/avr.c (avr_asm_init_sections): Likewise.
>> * config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_asm_init_sections): Likewise.
>> * config/mep/mep.c (mep_asm_init_sections): Likewise.
>> * config/microblaze/microblaze.c (microblaze_elf_asm_init_sections):
>> Likewise.
>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_elf_asm_init_sections): Likewise.
>> * config/stormy16/stormy16.c (xstormy16_asm_init_sections):
>> Likewise.
>> * config/v850/v850.c (v850_asm_init_sections): Likewise.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> H.J.
>
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 18:40 H.J. Lu
2011-03-31 15:15 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-14 19:11 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-26 13:08 ` H.J. Lu
2011-05-18 17:30 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-01 23:30 ` Carrot Wei
2011-06-03 4:31 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-03 12:31 ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-03 12:52 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-19 20:02 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-19 21:31 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-07-22 12:31 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-22 12:36 ` Rainer Orth
2011-07-22 12:36 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-22 13:20 ` Rainer Orth
2011-07-22 12:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-22 13:21 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-07-22 13:29 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-22 14:17 ` H.J. Lu
2011-07-22 14:55 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-06 14:51 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-09 14:32 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2011-08-14 19:20 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-19 10:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-08-19 14:58 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-19 15:54 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-08-20 21:16 ` H.J. Lu
2012-03-19 20:35 ` DJ Delorie
2012-03-19 20:40 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-03-19 20:42 ` DJ Delorie
2011-07-01 14:12 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-03 17:13 ` Michael Eager
2011-08-22 7:39 David Edelsohn
2011-08-22 7:44 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 7:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-08-22 14:23 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 15:27 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 15:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-22 17:37 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 18:33 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 19:12 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-08-22 19:19 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 19:38 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-08-22 20:50 ` H.J. Lu
2011-08-22 7:46 ` David Edelsohn
2011-08-22 16:26 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMe9rOryTBagJUGPDn_1zEAhn1+7CwA_Q7w=osPNyLb6NS5rdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).