public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Gallager <egall@gwmail.gwu.edu>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Monaco <andrea.monaco@autistici.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc/diagnostic.c: make -Werror message more helpful
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:33:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMfHzOssv11NWGQf_NOJExaP0CmFLfDhrijmU_zr_yAAuh9RSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecdf4ec2-b54d-a08d-0540-eaf82684641e@gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:17 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/12/21 3:13 AM, Andrea Monaco via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> >
> > I propose to make that message more verbose.  It sure would have helped
> > me once.  You don't always have a Web search available :)
>
> Warnings turned into errors have the [-Werror=...] tag at the end
> so I'm not sure I see when reiterating -Werror at the end of output
> would be helpful.  Can you explain the circumstances when it would
> have helped you?
>
> For what it's worth, a change here that I think might be more useful
> is printing the number of diagnostics of each kind (e.g., 2 warnings
> and 5 errors found).
>

I swear we already had a bug open for this suggestion, but after much
searching I can't seem to find it anymore, so if anyone has any ideas
of what keywords I forgot to try, feel free to send them...

> > Andrea Monaco
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.c b/gcc/diagnostic.c
> > index 4ded1760705..8b67662390e 100644
> > --- a/gcc/diagnostic.c
> > +++ b/gcc/diagnostic.c
> > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ default_diagnostic_final_cb (diagnostic_context *context)
> >         /* -Werror was given.  */
> >         if (context->warning_as_error_requested)
> >          pp_verbatim (context->printer,
> > -                    _("%s: all warnings being treated as errors"),
> > +                    _("%s: all warnings being treated as errors (-Werror; disable with -Wno-error)"),
>
> If this change should move forward, -Werror needs to be quoted
> (e.g., passed as an argument to %qs or surrounded in a pair of
> %< and %> directives).  The "disable with -Wno-error" part
> is superfluous and would not be entirely accurate for warnings
> promoted to errors by #pragma GCC diagnostic (those cannot be
> demoted back to warnings by -Wno-error).
>
> Martin
>
> >                       progname);
> >         /* At least one -Werror= was given.  */
> >         else
> >
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-12 10:13 Andrea Monaco
2021-12-13 18:17 ` Martin Sebor
2021-12-14 18:33   ` Eric Gallager [this message]
2021-12-14 21:35     ` Eric Gallager
2021-12-15  9:34   ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMfHzOssv11NWGQf_NOJExaP0CmFLfDhrijmU_zr_yAAuh9RSg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=egall@gwmail.gwu.edu \
    --cc=andrea.monaco@autistici.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).