From: Eric Gallager <egall@gwmail.gwu.edu>
To: Matt Jacobson <mhjacobson@me.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Objective-C: don't require redundant -fno-objc-sjlj-exceptions for the NeXT v2 ABI
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:09:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMfHzOsswZ+2DFPBQ+yry_oK8UN=YinAOVCwbGy8r+Dssjz60g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A5B0FDB-BE51-4801-96A1-6C83899F3D0C@me.com>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:36 PM Matt Jacobson via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> As is, an invocation of GCC with -fnext-runtime -fobjc-abi-version=2 crashes,
> unless target-specific code adds an implicit -fno-objc-sjlj-exceptions (which
> Darwin does).
>
> This patch makes the general case not crash.
>
> I don't have commit access, so if this patch is suitable, I'd need someone else
> to commit it for me. Thanks.
Is there a bug open for the issue that this fixes? Just wondering for
cross-referencing purposes...
>
> gcc/objc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-07-28 Matt Jacobson <mhjacobson@me.com>
>
> * objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c (objc_next_runtime_abi_02_init): Warn
> about and reset flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions regardless of
> flag_objc_exceptions.
>
>
> gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
>
> 2021-07-28 Matt Jacobson <mhjacobson@me.com>
>
> * c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Default to
> flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions = 1 only when flag_objc_abi < 2.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c b/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
> index c51d6d34726..2568df67972 100644
> --- a/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
> +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
> @@ -840,9 +840,9 @@ c_common_post_options (const char **pfilename)
> else if (!flag_gnu89_inline && !flag_isoc99)
> error ("%<-fno-gnu89-inline%> is only supported in GNU99 or C99 mode");
>
> - /* Default to ObjC sjlj exception handling if NeXT runtime. */
> + /* Default to ObjC sjlj exception handling if NeXT <v2 runtime. */
> if (flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions < 0)
> - flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions = flag_next_runtime;
> + flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions = (flag_next_runtime && flag_objc_abi < 2);
> if (flag_objc_exceptions && !flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions)
> flag_exceptions = 1;
>
> diff --git a/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c b/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c
> index 66c13ad0db2..9a0868410a8 100644
> --- a/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c
> +++ b/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ objc_next_runtime_abi_02_init (objc_runtime_hooks *rthooks)
> {
> extern_names = ggc_cleared_vec_alloc<hash> (SIZEHASHTABLE);
>
> - if (flag_objc_exceptions && flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions)
> + if (flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions)
> {
> inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION,
> "%<-fobjc-sjlj-exceptions%> is ignored for "
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-02 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 3:35 Matt Jacobson
2021-08-02 21:09 ` Eric Gallager [this message]
2021-08-02 21:37 ` Matt Jacobson
2021-08-03 18:39 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-08-11 2:06 ` Matt Jacobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMfHzOsswZ+2DFPBQ+yry_oK8UN=YinAOVCwbGy8r+Dssjz60g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=egall@gwmail.gwu.edu \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mhjacobson@me.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).