public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: committed [RISC-V]: Harden test scan patterns
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 05:48:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMqJFCo+e424rjCUCYGv9yDQtdEhV6J8zwuCb24bEQ286u-nwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMqJFCpfPUwh-617MJCEBb=cxf7561QHRthbL3cHxcdK2YrfbQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 22:12, Joern Rennecke
<joern.rennecke@embecosm.com> wrote:

> Also, we might have different directives for not scanning in LTO sections -
> or just ignoring .ascii .  Or maybe the other way round - you have to do
> something special if you want to scan inside strings, and by default we
> don't look inside strings?
> LTO information uses ascii, and ISTR sometimes also a zero-terminated
> variant (asciiz?); There might also some string constant outputs, or stabs
> information.
> One possible rule I think might work is: if the RE doesn't mention a quote,
> don't scan what's quoted inside double quotes.  Although we might to have
> to look out for backslash-escaped quotes to find the proper end of a quoted
> string.

I've though about this some more, and we need something that's simple for
dejagnu and simple to describe.

So I propose we look at the first character of the regexp, and if it's neither
^ nor \ (neither caret nor backslash), we consider the regexp un-anchored,
and prepend ^[^"]* , so it won't allow a match after a double quote.
Then document this in sourcebuild.texi, with some mention of lto information
and stabs, and also mentioning that if you really want to match irrespective
of a leading quote, you can prepend ^.* to your regexp.
There are good reasons to be more specific with your regexps in general,
but the matches in LTO are particularily damaging because they appear
semi-random, so often escape a regression test when the test is made,
only to surface during somebody else's regression test.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27  9:26 Joern Rennecke
2023-09-27 17:22 ` Jeff Law
2023-09-27 18:22   ` Joern Rennecke
2023-09-27 20:14     ` Jeff Law
2023-09-27 22:12       ` Andrew Pinski
2023-09-27 23:21       ` Vineet Gupta
2023-09-29 13:54         ` Jeff Law
2023-09-30 21:12           ` Joern Rennecke
2023-10-11  4:48             ` Joern Rennecke [this message]
2023-10-11  7:12               ` Joern Rennecke
2023-11-08 15:14               ` Joern Rennecke
2023-11-08 16:00           ` RFA: make scan-assembler* ignore LTO sections (Was: Re: committed [RISC-V]: Harden test scan patterns) Joern Rennecke
2023-11-10  6:02             ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMqJFCo+e424rjCUCYGv9yDQtdEhV6J8zwuCb24bEQ286u-nwQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joern.rennecke@embecosm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).