From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45805 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 07:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 45779 invoked by uid 89); 21 Dec 2016 07:36:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=reserved X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-yw0-f180.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.161.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:36:11 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r204so95447527ywb.0; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:36:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lKSRVZM+C7DoLCEVaZY3bj89HrN2QrWeHICURAWzb4M=; b=rvF+vRP+j3+tPOYF3suUfw9etkFF+czKCh7Qc8K53Pr9Vxio08RGPKP7MrpIBWuGDN vFct5lbmEKbAOG/IduxeueKDOJacbvGMYjM6sdUnvHEyEm4PPsc2oCiXDHazB620G3i0 TPCde+gcJK+A9vqIZyLbakodBDZQzYnkoUJNCLJletLS6LnUu0XpkXKAXR+RowiJkLVg MsF6RActBNDeYsJrefTgwwaXbEJ9uqLema6wojMz0ZzZfa9r4GEHhIiIz81TgWG4J+hx jQZqVzthywcJqfOe3h0TYDDncj/qf05egrUSR5cgUFc3UdL4L/8RX+Vxlgt87k8q3WSQ 19eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIay7Nk0aS8rJWlgHKPgG4qljUa/qmTPPl8lh00bdAwfbePUVZg9Ieh4VlYpjmFB9XibJNupYgzjDV0/w== X-Received: by 10.129.153.14 with SMTP id q14mr2690446ywg.191.1482305769891; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:36:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.160.104 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:36:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7B77C4F5-BAFB-4727-B0A2-B3B93446F8B5@gmail.com> References: <1481892792-406-1-git-send-email-blomqvist.janne@gmail.com> <09EA6A5E-6461-41BB-9E40-06A33F87C565@gmail.com> <7B77C4F5-BAFB-4727-B0A2-B3B93446F8B5@gmail.com> From: Janne Blomqvist Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused libgfortran functions To: FX Cc: Fortran List , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg01748.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, FX wrote: >> I don't understand. Why would it imply a 1:1 mapping of release series >> with major ABI versions? > > OK, I thought you meant to map libgfortran version numbers (libgfortran.s= o.7 with GCC 7). If it=E2=80=99s the gfortran.map node names, I=E2=80=99m h= appy with that indeed. > > Attached patch regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin16.3.0. > OK to commit? Ok, thanks! > > >> Currently we have _gfortran_, that is with a single underscore in the >> beginning, so it's not in the "C/POSIX reserved for the implementation >> namespace". But yes, I agree that at least those functions documented >> under the non-Fortran main program section in the manual should be >> kept as is. > > Then, if we keep some functions under _gfortran_, I say let=E2=80=99s kee= p them all there. It=E2=80=99s not hurting, and the few users who care have= come to expect it. Fair enough, works for me. --=20 Janne Blomqvist