From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-316795-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18538 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2012 17:32:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 18448 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2012 17:32:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:25 +0000
Received: by lbbgk1 with SMTP id gk1so53977lbb.20        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.146.234 with SMTP id tf10mr2191218lab.31.1334338343425; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.14.36 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F8537F2.4050607@netcologne.de>
References: <4F6DD691.9010907@netcologne.de>	<4F8537F2.4050607@netcologne.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAO9iq9F3D4=e=OccfWRN+w2+rCW6ObaO-cqR8xuLeJ4fiiftEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran-dev] Use fixed variable sizes for stride calculations
From: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:51, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> this patch uses division by known sizes (which can usually be replaced
>> by a simple shift because intrinsics have sizes of power of two) instead
>> of division by the size extracted from the array descriptor itself.
>>
>> This should save about 20 cycles for a single calculation.
>>
>> I'll go through the rest of the library to identify other possibilities
>> for this.
>>
>> Regression-tested, no new failures.
>>
>> OK for the branch?
>
>
> Full patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-03/msg00120.html
>
> Ping?
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thomas

I thought I already approved this a few weeks ago
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-03/msg00144.html)? Or if it has
been decided that I'm no longer a GFortran reviewer, it would be nice
if I'd be informed of this as well.


--=20
Janne Blomqvist