From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31362 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2012 14:30:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31351 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2012 14:30:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:30:21 +0000 Received: by wgbed3 with SMTP id ed3so4110455wgb.8 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:30:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=FW3ZsW6ZY+xmkx/Uu121b/R4OyppWq/SYWGR1w9Rrio=; b=RhfTI3x8HL3dRY9QdVBlUjRMqKTlxhaJCgRT18ArZp4eB/L5Kg1LVv49cPURgb+lAP gRFTdIE21rf/8yXARi8rRlFfa3QvR1bG/EF3GBvIyL+nyCAWNBIaacDG0c94VtUFjtky XAFaTVU2Xexyf1wsdixHoFeFqX6vDROmwBfn4C9pulAqM7DMLYF2JkuBGRhzK5y44JFn JJw4tP0Wqy5bNY9f5fxURGNf5z9fBYIlevRwWDi2ehLmLIuJTB6h9AwC4zb5lQ4UVTGU 6NL57wrXVwdohWZfvTdhtzYYG9A7pOjPJlhWTs0It6wRXap8Vv+6AFplyhiFwL3/meWH HVZA== Received: by 10.180.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr29472946wia.9.1345473020624; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:30:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr29472908wia.9.1345473020405; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.65.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120816192850.GN1999@tucnak.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reproducible gcc builds, gfortran, and -grecord-gcc-switches From: Simon Baldwin To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Michael Matz , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJAZHL8o/EJ1sCQEHiC67P0mt83CQaexMLJzUu3xfOhdN82Jl7xUMDdCpBZuwps5GRLRhr+cYDlPV1LZUcnwcNsT1DxAIAtCNZs68heN+7c2IXvnZl2kn6op8JqNZrl/vQZGW6u5XnM0NxlDHMvMlG5VW27Ugk5CnTFHrq8VHA1FnQ6KSjGvWfUGrF/070IUCFoFzl X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg01351.txt.bz2 On 17 August 2012 16:55, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Simon Baldwin wrote: > > > > You could have just added > > > case OPT_cpp_: > > > to the switch in gen_producer_string, instead of all this. > > > > Thanks. I was under the impression, apparently mistaken, that > > OPT_cpp_ exists only if fortran is enabled. > > OPT_* for Fortran options only exist when the Fortran front-end is in the > source tree (whether or not enabled). I think we try to avoid knowingly > breaking use cases where people remove some front ends from the source > tree, although we don't actively test them and no longer provide split-up > source tarballs. Thanks for the update. Which fix should move forwards? -- Google UK Limited | Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | Registered in England Number: 3977902